Ratio 23 (1):1-16 (2010)
Suppose a person who is agnostic about most philosophical issues wishes to have true philosophical beliefs but equally wishes to avoid false philosophical beliefs. I argue that this truth-seeking, error-avoiding agnostic would not have good grounds for pursuing philosophy. Widespread disagreement shows that pursuing philosophy is not a reliable method of discovering true answers to philosophical questions. More likely than not, pursuing philosophy leads to false belief. Many attempts to rebut this sceptical argument fail.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
Philosophical Renegades.Bryan Frances - 2013 - In Jennifer Lackey & David Christensen (eds.), The Epistemology of Disagreement: New Essays. Oxford University Press. pp. 121-166.
When Do Evolutionary Explanations of Belief Debunk Belief?Paul E. Griffiths & John S. Wilkins - forthcoming - In Darwin in the 21st Century.
Understanding Human Knowledge: Philosophical Essays.Barry Stroud - 2000 - Oxford University Press.
Scepticism and its Sources.Samir Okasha - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):610–632.
Quine's Pragmatic Solution to Sceptical Doubts.Benjamin Bayer - 2010 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 18 (2):177-204.
Added to index2009-05-28
Total downloads463 ( #3,578 of 2,132,314 )
Recent downloads (6 months)20 ( #22,289 of 2,132,314 )
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.