The Journal of Ethics 2 (1):27-55 (1998)

The libertarian view of freedom has attracted considerable attention in the past three decades. It has also been subjected to numerous criticisms regarding its nature and effects on society. G. A. Cohen''s recent book, Self-Ownership, Freedom and Equality, continues this attack by linking libertarian views on freedom to their view of self-ownership. This paper formulates and evaluates Cohen''s major arguments against libertarian freedom and self-ownership. It contends that his arguments against the libertarian rights definition of freedom are inadequate and need modification. Similarly, Cohen''s defense of restrictions on self-ownership on behalf of autonomy are also found wanting. Finally, I argue that the thesis of self-ownership (whether in its full or partial version) ought to be rejected.
Keywords autonomy  Cohen  freedom  libertarianism  Nozick  self-ownership
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1009786331882
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 56,081
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Embodiment and Self-Ownership: Daniel C. Russell.Daniel C. Russell - 2010 - Social Philosophy and Policy 27 (1):135-167.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
251 ( #33,569 of 2,403,892 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
10 ( #68,469 of 2,403,892 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes