The current state of (radical) pragmatics in the cognitive sciences

Mind and Language 17 (1-2):169–187 (2002)
This paper considers some issues for traditional and radical views of the semantic content of utterances. It suggests that, as the radical view denies that linguistic meaning solely determines explicit content, it is required to come up with an alternative account of content. We focus on cognitively oriented radical theories and argue that none of the current alternatives for delimiting content is adequate. An alternative radical account of content is sketched. We also consider Stanley's (2000) binding argument in support of the traditional view and suggest that it fails as it is based on an overly strong conception of binding in natural language.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/1468-0017.00194
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 36,649
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Communication and Folk Psychology.Richard Breheny - 2006 - Mind and Language 21 (1):74-107.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total downloads
20 ( #316,633 of 2,304,171 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #82,128 of 2,304,171 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature