Philosophies 3 (4):41 (2018)

A new demarcation is proposed between Natural Philosophy and non-Natural Philosophy—philosophy tout court—based on whether or not they follow a non-standard logic of real processes. This non-propositional logic, Logic in Reality, is based on the original work of the Franco-Romanian thinker Stéphane Lupasco. Many Natural Philosophies remain bounded by dependence on binary linguistic concepts of logic. I claim that LIR can naturalize—bring into science—part of such philosophies. Against the potential objection that my approach blurs the distinction between science and philosophy, I reply that there is no problem in differentiating experimental physical science and philosophy; any complete distinction between philosophy, including the philosophy of science and the other sciences is invidious. It was historically unnecessary and is unnecessary today. The convergence of science and philosophy, proposed by Wu Kun based on implications of the philosophy of information, supports this position. LIR provides a rigorous basis for giving equivalent ontological value to diversity and identity, what is contradictory, inconsistent, absent, missing or past, unconscious, incomplete, and fuzzy as to their positive counterparts. The naturalized Natural Philosophy resulting from the application of these principles is a candidate for the ‘new synthesis’ called for by the editors.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3390/philosophies3040041
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 72,634
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Towards an Ontological Foundation of Information Ethics.Rafael Capurro - 2006 - Ethics and Information Technology 8 (4):175-186.
Epistemic Informational Structural Realism.Majid Beni - 2016 - Minds and Machines 26 (4):323-339.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Popper’s Paradoxical Pursuit of Natural Philosophy.Nicholas Maxwell - 2004 - In Jeremy Shearmur & Geoffrey Stokes (eds.), The Cambridge Companion to Popper. Cambridge University Press. pp. 170-207.
The Philosophical Logic of Stéphane Lupasco (1900–1988).Joseph E. Brenner - 2010 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 19 (3):243-285.
Francis Bacon and the Classification of Natural History.Peter Anstey - 2012 - Early Science and Medicine 17 (1):11-31.
Popper's Paradoxical Pursuit of Natural Philosophy.Nicholas Maxwell - 2016 - In J. Shearmur & G. Stokes (eds.), Cambridge Companion to Popper. Cambridge University Press. pp. 170-207.
The Social Ingredients in All Ways of Acquiring Reliable Knowledge.Rom Harré - 2016 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 47 (1):67-77.
On Materialism in Natural Science.Hu Wen-Keng - 1974 - Contemporary Chinese Thought 5 (3):35-68.
The Nature of Natural Philosophy in the Late Middle Ages.Edward Grant - 2010 - Catholic University of America Press.


Added to PP index

Total views
1 ( #1,558,399 of 2,533,755 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #389,210 of 2,533,755 )

How can I increase my downloads?


Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes