The right to a competent electorate

Philosophical Quarterly 61 (245):700-724 (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The practice of unrestricted universal suffrage is unjust. Citizens have a right that any political power held over them should be exercised by competent people in a competent way. Universal suffrage violates this right. To satisfy this right, universal suffrage in most cases must be replaced by a moderate epistocracy, in which suffrage is restricted to citizens of sufficient political competence. Epistocracy itself seems to fall foul of the qualified acceptability requirement, that political power must be distributed in ways against which there are no qualified objections. However, it is less intrinsically unjust than democracy with universal suffrage, and probably produces more just outcomes. Thus epistocracy is more just than democracy, even if not perfectly just

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 93,031

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

There is no right to a competent electorate.Brian Kogelmann & Jeffrey Carroll - forthcoming - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
Democratic Legitimacy and the Competence Obligation.Finlay Malcolm - 2021 - Moral Philosophy and Politics 8 (1):109-130.
Epistocracy and Public Interests.Finlay Malcolm - 2021 - Res Publica 28 (1):173-192.
Epistocracy is a Wolf in Wolf’s Clothing.Justin Klocksiem - 2019 - The Journal of Ethics 23 (1):19-36.
Against Epistocracy.Piero Moraro - 2018 - Social Theory and Practice 44 (2):199-216.
The enfranchisement lottery.Claudio López-Guerra - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (2):211-233.
Demographic Objections to Epistocracy: A Generalization.Sean Ingham & David Wiens - 2021 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 49 (4):323-349.
The Democratic Duty to Educate Oneself.Steinar Bøyum - 2018 - Etikk I Praksis - Nordic Journal of Applied Ethics 2:129-141.
The enfranchisement lottery.Claudio Lopez-Guerra - 2011 - Politics, Philosophy and Economics 10 (2):1470594-10372206.

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-02-22

Downloads
679 (#26,043)

6 months
47 (#94,517)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jason Brennan
Georgetown University

Citations of this work

Is Epistocracy Irrational?Adam F. Gibbons - 2022 - Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 21 (2).
Plural Voting for the Twenty-First Century.Thomas Mulligan - 2018 - Philosophical Quarterly 68 (271):286-306.
Epistocracy and Public Interests.Finlay Malcolm - 2021 - Res Publica 28 (1):173-192.
The Curious Case of the Jury-shaped Hole: A Plea for Real Jury Research.Lewis Ross - forthcoming - International Journal of Evidence and Proof.

View all 57 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references