Two steps forward, one step back: Partner-specific effects in a psychology of dialogue

Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):192-193 (2004)
Pickering & Garrod's (P&G's) call to study language processing in dialogue context is an appealing one. Their interactive alignment model is ambitious, aiming to explain the converging behavior of dialogue partners via both intra- and interpersonal priming. However, they ignore the flexible, partner-specific processing demonstrated by some recent dialogue studies. We discuss implications of these data.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S0140525X04240055
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,941
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

A Call for More Dialogue and More Details.J. Cooper Cutting - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):194-194.
Linguistics Fit for Dialogue.Simon Garrod & Martin J. Pickering - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (6):678-678.
Is Language Processing Different in Dialogue?Dale J. Barr & Boaz Keysar - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):190-191.
Dialogue: Can Two Be Cheaper Than One?Sam Glucksberg - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):199-199.
Visual Copresence and Conversational Coordination.Susan R. Fussell & Robert E. Kraut - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):196-197.
Toward a Mechanistic Psychology of Dialogue.Martin J. Pickering & Simon Garrod - 2004 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 (2):169-190.


Added to PP index

Total downloads
14 ( #417,905 of 2,293,866 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #138,506 of 2,293,866 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature