An Accuracy‐Dominance Argument for Conditionalization

Noûs 54 (1):162-181 (2020)

Abstract

Noûs, EarlyView.

Download options

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 72,694

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2018-06-22

Downloads
158 (#76,431)

6 months
8 (#90,589)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Richard Pettigrew
Bristol University
R. A. Briggs
Stanford University

Citations of this work

Lockeans Maximize Expected Accuracy.Kevin Dorst - 2019 - Mind 128 (509):175-211.
Updating for Externalists.J. Dmitri Gallow - 2021 - Noûs 55 (3):487-516.
Interpretations of Probability.Alan Hájek - 2007 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Logical Ignorance and Logical Learning.Richard Pettigrew - 2021 - Synthese 198 (10):9991-10020.

View all 39 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Accuracy and Ur-Prior Conditionalization.Nilanjan Das - 2019 - Review of Symbolic Logic 12 (1):62-96.
Understanding Conditionalization.Christopher J. G. Meacham - 2015 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (5):767-797.
Chance, Credence and Circles.Fabrizio Cariani - 2017 - Episteme 14 (1):49-58.
Symmetry Arguments in Probability Kinematics.R. I. G. Hughes & Bas C. van Fraassen - 1984 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:851-869.
Walters on Conjunction Conditionalization.Arif Ahmed - 2011 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 111 (1pt1):115-122.