Cognition is not computation: The argument from irreversibility

Synthese 113 (2):285-320 (1997)
Selmer Bringsjord
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
The dominant scientific and philosophical view of the mind – according to which, put starkly, cognition is computation – is refuted herein, via specification and defense of the following new argument: Computation is reversible; cognition isn't; ergo, cognition isn't computation. After presenting a sustained dialectic arising from this defense, we conclude with a brief preview of the view we would put in place of the cognition-is-computation doctrine.
Keywords Cognition  Computation  Epistemology  Mind  Science
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 1998
DOI 10.1023/A:1005019131238
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 34,998
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

An Argument for P = NP.Selmer Bringsjord - 2017 - Minds and Machines 27 (4):663-672.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total downloads
145 ( #40,472 of 2,274,821 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #150,698 of 2,274,821 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature