Psychological Review 125 (4):606-615 (2018)
AbstractThe network approach to psychopathology is becoming increasingly popular. The motivation for this approach is to provide a replacement for the problematic common cause perspective and the associated latent variable model, where symptoms are taken to be mere effects of a common cause (the disorder itself). The idea is that the latent variable model is plausible for medical diseases, but unrealistic for mental disorders, which should rather be conceptualized as networks of directly interacting symptoms. We argue that this rationale for the network approach is misguided. Latent variable (or common cause) models are not inherently problematic, and there is not even a clear boundary where network models end and latent variable (or common cause) models begin. We also argue that focusing on this contrast has led to an unrealistic view of testing and finding support for the network approach, as well as an oversimplified picture of the relationship between medical diseases and mental disorders. As an alternative, we point out more essential contrasts, such as the contrast between dynamic and static modeling approaches, that can provide a better framework for conceptualizing mental disorders. Finally, we discuss several topics and open problems that need to be addressed in order to make the network approach more concrete and to move the field of psychological network research forward.
Similar books and articles
Toward Scientifically Useful Quantitative Models of Psychopathology: The Importance of a Comparative Approach.Robert F. Krueger, Colin G. DeYoung & Kristian E. Markon - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):163-164.
Networks as Complex Dynamic Systems: Applications to Clinical and Developmental Psychology and Psychopathology.Paul Lc van Geert & Henderien W. Steenbeek - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):174 - 175.
The Rocky Road From Axis I to Axis II: Extending the Network Model of Diagnostic Comorbidity to Personality Pathology.Robert F. Bornstein - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):151-152.
Large-Scale Brain Networks and Psychopathology: A Unifying Triple Network Model.Vinod Menon - 2011 - Trends in Cognitive Sciences 15 (10):483-506.
Neural Networks and Psychopathology: Connectionist Models in Practice and Research.Dan J. Stein & Jacques Ludik (eds.) - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.
The History of Neural Network Research in Psychopathology.Manfred Spitzer - 1998 - In Dan J. Stein & J. Ludick (eds.), Neural Networks and Psychopathology. Cambridge University Press.
The Future of Emotion Research in the Study of Psychopathology.Ann M. Kring - 2010 - Emotion Review 2 (3):225-228.
Toward a Model of Attention and Cognition, Using a Parallel Distributed Processing Approach: Part 2: The Sweeping Model.Gregory Christ - 1991 - Journal of Mind and Behavior 12 (3):347-366.
The Nature of Delusions: A Hierarchical Neural Network Approach.Eric Yh Chen & German E. Berrios - 1998 - In Dan J. Stein & J. Ludick (eds.), Neural Networks and Psychopathology. Cambridge University Press.
Problems with the DSM Approach to Classifying Psychopathology.Jeffrey S. Poland, Barbara von Eckardt & Will Spaulding - 1994 - In George Graham & G.L. Stephens (eds.), Philosophical Psychopathology. MIT Press.
Extending the Network Perspective on Comorbidity.Brian D. Haig & Frances M. Vertue - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):158-158.
Comorbidity: The Case of Developmental Psychopathology.Aribert Rothenberger, Tobias Banaschewski, Andreas Becker & Veit Roessner - 2010 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 33 (2-3):167-168.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Network Theory of Psychiatric Disorders: A Critical Assessment of the Inclusion of Environmental Factors.Nina S. de Boer, Leon C. de Bruin, Jeroen J. G. Geurts & Gerrit Glas - 2021 - Frontiers in Psychology 12.
What's in a Model? Network Models as Tools Instead of Representations of What Psychiatric Disorders Really Are.Hanna M. van Loo & Jan-Willem Romeijn - 2019 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 42.
Metacognitive Therapy Versus Cognitive Behavioral Therapy:A Network Approach.Sverre Urnes Johnson & Asle Hoffart - 2018 - Frontiers in Psychology 9.
Networks, Intentionality and Multiple Realizability: Not Enough to Block Reductionism.Markus I. Eronen & Laura F. Bringmann - 2019 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 42.
The Network Takeover Reaches Psychopathology.Richard J. McNally - 2019 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 42.
References found in this work
No references found.