Incongruent counterparts and modal relationism

Abstract
Kant's argument from incongruent counterparts for substantival space is examined; it is concluded that the argument has no force against a relationist. The argument does suggest that a relationist cannot give an account of enantiomorphism, incongruent counterparts and orientability. The prospects for a relationist account of these notions are assessed, and it is found that they are good provided the relationist is some kind of modal relationist. An illustration and interpretation of these modal commitments is given.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/02698599908573607
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy on self-archival     Papers currently archived: 25,071
Through your library
References found in this work BETA
Minds, Brains and Programs.John R. Searle - 1980 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3 (3):417-57.
Dispositions and Conditionals.C. B. Martin - 1994 - Philosophical Quarterly 44 (174):1-8.
Science Without Numbers.Hartry Field - 1980 - Princeton University Press.
Relational Concepts of Space and Time.Julian B. Barbour - 1982 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 33 (3):251-274.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Kant's Hands and Earman's Pions: Chirality Arguments for Substantival Space.Carl Hoefer - 2000 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (3):237 – 256.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
A Remark on Kant's Argument From Incongruent Counterparts.Jeremy Byrd - 2008 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 16 (4):789 – 800.
Temporally Incongruent Counterparts.Hud Hudson - 2004 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 68 (2):337 - 343.
Kant's Hands and Earman's Pions: Chirality Arguments for Substantival Space.Carl Hoefer - 2000 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 14 (3):237 – 256.
What Incongruent Counterparts Show.David Landy - 2013 - European Journal of Philosophy 21 (4):507-524.
Incongruent Counterparts and Causality.Sean Walsh - 2007 - Kant-Studien 98 (4):418-430.
Kant's Uses of the Argument From Incongruent Counterparts.Mark Hulbert - 1993 - Southwest Philosophy Review 9 (2):110-113.
Incongruent Counterparts and the Reality of Space.Graham Nerlich - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (3):598-613.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

87 ( #56,126 of 2,132,818 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

5 ( #175,042 of 2,132,818 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums