Joint attention, triangulation and radical interpretation: A problem and its solution

Dialectica 58 (2):179–206 (2004)
Authors
Ingar Brinck
Lund University
Abstract
By describing the aim of triangulation as locating the object of thoughts and utterances, Davidson has given it the double role of accounting for both the individuation of content and the sense in which content necessarily is public. The focus of this article is on how triangulation may contribute to the individuation of content. I maintain that triangulation may serve to break into the intentional circle of meaning and belief, yet without forcing us to renounce the claims concerning the interdependence of belief and meaning and the irreducibility of meaning. In the first two sections the concept of triangulation is introduced and examined. In the following section, I present a problem for triangulation that takes the form of a dilemma. Triangulation, as Davidson describes it, is either pre-cognitive or propositional. In neither case can it in a satisfactory way determine content. In section 4, I suggest that reconceiving triangulation in terms of joint attention will solve the problem. Joint attention is not a purely causal process, nor does it involve propositional thought. The next section presents an analysis of joint attention, and explains how joint attention may contribute to determine content by paving the way for language entry. Finally, an account is given of how subjects during the process of joint attention may express and understand communicative intentions without engaging in higher-order thought.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1746-8361.2004.tb00296.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 35,445
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Studies in the Way of Words.H. Paul Grice - 1989 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Mind, Language, and Reality.Hilary Putnam - 1975 - Cambridge University Press.
Radical Interpretation.Donald Davidson - 1973 - Dialectica 27 (1):314-328.
Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective.Donald Davidson - 1996 - In Philosophy. Bristol: Thoemmes. pp. 555-558.

View all 21 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Joint Attention and the Problem of Other Minds.Johannes Roessler - 2005 - In Naomi Eilan, Christoph Hoerl, Teresa McCormack & Johannes Roessler (eds.), Joint Attention: Communication and Other Minds: Issues in Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Mentale Simulation Und Radikale Interpretation.Christian Beyer - 2006 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 70 (1):25-45.
Joint Attention, Communication, and Mind.Naomi M. Eilan - 2005 - In N. Elian, Christoph Hoerl, Teresa McCormack & Johannes Roessler (eds.), Joint Attention: Communication and Other Minds. Oxford University Press. pp. 1.
Davidsonian Triangulation and Heideggerian Comportment.Timothy J. Nulty - 2006 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 14 (3):443 – 453.
Triangulating with Davidson.Claudine Verheggen - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (226):96-103.
Joint Attention and Common Knowledge.John Campbell - 2005 - In Naomi M. Eilan, Christoph Hoerl, Teresa McCormack & Johannes Roessler (eds.), Joint Attention: Communication and Other Minds: Issues in Philosophy and Psychology. Oxford: Clarendon Press. pp. 287--297.
Davidson's Triangulation: Content‐Endowing Causes and Circularity.Maria Lasonen & Tomas Marvan - 2004 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 12 (2):177 - 195.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
67 ( #95,739 of 2,285,000 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #163,003 of 2,285,000 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature