Journal of Religious Ethics 40 (3):546-550 (2012)

Abstract
This Comment argues that Stephen Bush's critique of Georges Bataille's meditative practice fails to recognize how the disruption of the self, and the challenge to goal-oriented activity that comprise the heart of that practice, serve as an ethical limit that protects against sadistic and violent engagement with the world. The ethical disposition fostered by Bataille's practice is a dissolution of the self
Keywords loss of self  sadomasochism  violence  Amy Hollywood  Georges Bataille
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9795.2012.00535.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,715
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Georges Bataille's Mystical Cruelty.Stephen S. Bush - 2012 - Journal of Religious Ethics 40 (3):551-555.
Support for Investor Activism Among U.K. Ethical Investors.Alan Lewis & Craig Mackenzie - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 24 (3):215 - 222.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2012-07-24

Total views
25 ( #407,565 of 2,386,633 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #552,015 of 2,386,633 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes