Philosophy and Technology 33 (1):53-70 (2020)

Authors
Ingar Brinck
Lund University
Christian Balkenius
Lund University
Abstract
Mutually adaptive interaction involves the robot as a partner as opposed to a tool, and requires that the robot is susceptible to similar environmental cues and behavior patterns as humans are. Recognition, or the acknowledgement of the other as individual, is fundamental to mutually adaptive interaction between humans. We discuss what recognition involves and its behavioral manifestations, and describe the benefits of implementing it in HRI.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s13347-018-0339-x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,391
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Understanding A.I. — Can and Should We Empathize with Robots?Susanne Schmetkamp - forthcoming - Review of Philosophy and Psychology:1-17.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Children with Autism Social Engagement in Interaction with Nao, an Imitative Robot: A Series of Single Case Experiments.Adriana Tapus, Andreea Peca, Amir Aly, Cristina Pop, Lavinia Jisa, Sebastian Pintea, Alina S. Rusu & Daniel O. David - 2012 - Interaction Studiesinteraction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 13 (3):315-347.
Temporal Patterns in Multi-Modal Social Interaction Between Elderly Users and Service Robot.Ning Wang, Alessandro Di Nuovo, Angelo Cangelosi & Ray Jones - 2019 - Interaction Studies: Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 20 (1):4-24.
There is No 'I' in 'Robot': Robots and Utilitarianism (Expanded & Revised).Christopher Grau - 2011 - In Susan Anderson & Michael Anderson (eds.), Machine Ethics. Cambridge University Press. pp. 451.
Exploring the Effect of a User’s Personality Traits on Tactile Communication with a Robot Using Bayesian Networks.Jungsik Hwang & Kun Chang Lee - 2015 - Interaction Studiesinteraction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 16 (1):29-53.
The Effects of Exposure to Different Social Robots on Attitudes Toward Preferences.Evgenios Vlachos, Elizabeth Jochum & Louis-Philippe Demers - 2016 - Interaction Studies: Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 17 (3):390-404.
Does Appearance Matter in the Interaction of Children with Autism with a Humanoid Robot?Ben Robins, Kerstin Dautenhahn & Janek Dubowski - 2006 - Interaction Studies: Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 7 (3):479-512.
Towards a Conceptual and Methodological Framework for Determining Robot Believability.Robert Rose, Matthias Scheutz & Paul Schermerhorn - 2010 - Interaction Studiesinteraction Studies Social Behaviour and Communication in Biological and Artificial Systems 11 (2):314-335.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-03-10

Total views
4 ( #1,167,060 of 2,326,335 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #212,154 of 2,326,335 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes