Philosophical Studies 52 (3):331 - 355 (1987)

Authors
Phillip Bricker
University of Massachusetts, Amherst
Abstract
The most commonly heard proposals for reducing possible worlds to language succumb to a simple cardinality argument: it can be shown that there are more possible worlds than there are linguistic entities provided by the proposal. In this paper, I show how the standard proposals can be generalized in a natural way so as to make better use of the resources available to them, and thereby circumvent the cardinality argument. Once it is seen just what the limitations are on these more general proposals, it can be clearly seen where the real difficulty lies with any attempt to reduce possible worlds to language. Roughly, the difficulty is this: no actual language could have the descriptive resources needed to represent all the ways things might have been. I conclude by arguing that this same difficulty spells doom for any nominalist or conceptualist proposal for reducing possible worlds.
Keywords Possible Worlds  Modality  Actualism  Modal Ersatzism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00354052
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 60,021
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Counterfactuals.David Lewis - 1973 - Blackwell.
Logical Foundations of Probability.Rudolf Carnap - 1950 - Chicago]University of Chicago Press.

View all 15 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Reductive Theories of Modality.Theodore Sider - 2003 - In Michael J. Loux & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics. Oxford University Press. pp. 180-208.
The Ersatz Pluriverse.Theodore Sider - 2002 - Journal of Philosophy 99 (6):279-315.
Impossible Worlds.Mark Jago - 2013 - Noûs 47 (3):713-728.
Possible Worlds.Christopher Menzel - 2013 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Impossible Worlds and Partial Belief.Edward Elliott - 2019 - Synthese 196 (8):3433-3458.

View all 13 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Haecceitism, Anti-Haecceitism, and Possible Worlds: A Case Study.Brad Skow - 2008 - Philosophical Quarterly 58 (230):97-107.
Concrete Possible Worlds.Phillip Bricker - 2008 - In Theodore Sider, John Hawthorne & Dean W. Zimmerman (eds.), Contemporary Debates in Metaphysics. Blackwell. pp. 111--134.
Absolute Actuality and the Plurality of Worlds.Phillip Bricker - 2006 - Philosophical Perspectives 20 (1):41–76.
A Characterization of Haecceitism.Alessandro Torza - 2011 - Analytic Philosophy 52 (4):262-266.
Partial Worlds and Paradox.Elke Brendel - 1993 - Erkenntnis 39 (2):191 - 208.
What Are Centered Worlds?Shen-yi Liao - 2012 - Philosophical Quarterly 62 (247):294-316.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
157 ( #64,438 of 2,433,462 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #172,561 of 2,433,462 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes