Understanding social norms and constitutive rules: Perspectives from developmental psychology and philosophy


Authors
Ingar Brinck
Lund University
Abstract
An experimental paradigm that purports to test young children’s understanding of social norms is examined. The paradigm models norms on Searle’s notion of a constitutive rule. The experiments and the reasons provided for their design are discussed. It is argued that the experiments do not provide direct evidence about the development of social norms and that the concepts of a social norm and constitutive rule are distinct. The experimental data are re-interpreted, and suggestions for how to deal with the present criticism are presented that do not require abandoning the paradigm as such. Then the conception of normativity that underlies the experimental paradigm is rejected and an alternative view is put forward. It is argued that normativity emerges from interaction and engagement, and that learning to comply with social norms involves understanding the distinction between their content, enforcement, and acceptance. As opposed to rule-based accounts that picture the development of an understanding of social norms as one-directional and based in enforcement, the present view emphasizes that normativity is situated, reciprocal, and interactive
Keywords Social norm  Constitutive rule  Rule game  Compliance  Intersubjectivity  Situated normativity
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11097-015-9426-y
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language.William P. Alston - 1969 - Philosophical Quarterly 20 (79):172-179.

View all 29 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Social Deontics: A Nano‐Level Approach to Human Power Play.Melisa Stevanovic - 2018 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 48 (3):369-389.
The Social Roots of Normativity.Glenda Satne - 2015 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 14 (4):673-682.
Dialogue in the making: emotional engagement with materials.Ingar Brinck & Vasudevi Reddy - 2020 - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 19 (1):23-45.
Persons and Affordances.Patrizio Lo Presti - forthcoming - Ecological Psychology.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Norms of Thought: Are They Social?Pascal Engel - 2001 - Mind and Society 2 (3):129-148.
Pravidla, Normy a Analytický Filozofický Diskurz.Vladimír Svoboda - 2012 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 19 (2):143-179.
The Social Rule Theory of Law.Brian Mccalla Miller - 1982 - Dissertation, University of Massachusetts Amherst
How to Think About Rules and Rule Following.Karsten R. Stueber - 2005 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35 (3):307-323.
Social Practices and Normativity.Joseph Rouse - 2007 - Philosophy of the Social Sciences 37 (1):46-56.
On the Concept of Basic Social Norms.Wolfgang Detel - 2008 - Analyse & Kritik 30 (2):469-482.
The Shmagency Question.Matthew Silverstein - 2015 - Philosophical Studies 172 (5):1127-1142.
Practices, Norms and Recognition.Titus Stahl - 2007 - Human Affairs 17 (1):10-21.
Young Children Enforce Social Norms.Marco F. H. Schmidt & Michael Tomasello - 2012 - Current Directions in Psychological Science 21 (4):232-236.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-06-14

Total views
534 ( #8,598 of 2,286,402 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
148 ( #3,516 of 2,286,402 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature