Why Do Scientists Lie?

Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 89:117-129 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX


It's natural to think of scientists as truth seekers, people driven by an intense curiosity to understand the natural world. Yet this picture of scientists and scientific inquiry sits uncomfortably with the reality and prevalence of scientific fraud. If one wants to get at the truth about nature, why lie? Won't that just set inquiry back, as people pursue false leads? To understand why this occurs – and what can be done about it – we need to understand the social structures scientists work within, and how some of the institutions which enable science to be such a successful endeavour all things considered, also abet and encourage fraud.



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,122

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On fraud.Liam Kofi Bright - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (2):291-310.
Is Science Really a Young Man’s Game?K. Brad Wray - 2003 - Social Studies of Science 33 (1):137-49.
Why Frankenstein is a Stigma Among Scientists.Peter Nagy, Ruth Wylie, Joey Eschrich & Ed Finn - 2018 - Science and Engineering Ethics 24 (4):1143-1159.
Citizen Science – Science as a Vocation.Evgeny V. Maslanov & Anton V. Dolmatov - 2019 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 56 (3):40-44.
Brain, mind, man, and society: Naturalism with a human face.Daniel Andler - 2006 - In D. Andler, M. Okada & I. Watanabe (eds.), Reasoning and Cognition. pp. 77--84.
What Scientists Think.Jeremy Stangroom (ed.) - 2005 - Routledge.
The social responsibilities of biological scientists.Stanley Joel Reiser & Ruth E. Bulger - 1997 - Science and Engineering Ethics 3 (2):137-143.
Boundary Maintenance, Border Crossing and the Nature/culture Divide.John Bone & David Inglis - 2006 - European Journal of Social Theory 9 (2):272-287.
Do Scientists Need Social Networks for Scientists?Evgeny V. Maslanov - 2019 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 56 (4):37-42.
Conservatism and the Scientific State of Nature.Erich Kummerfeld & Kevin J. S. Zollman - 2016 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 67 (4):1057-1076.


Added to PP

239 (#80,135)

6 months
29 (#100,095)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Liam Kofi Bright
London School of Economics

Citations of this work

Add more citations

References found in this work

Is Peer Review a Good Idea?Remco Heesen & Liam Kofi Bright - 2021 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 72 (3):635-663.
The Ethics of Identity.Kwame Anthony Appiah - 2005 - Princeton University Press.
The division of cognitive labor.Philip Kitcher - 1990 - Journal of Philosophy 87 (1):5-22.

View all 18 references / Add more references