Mentis (2020)

Authors
Benedikt Paul Göcke
Ruhr-Universität Bochum
Abstract
Panpsychism has become a highly attractive position in the philosophy of mind. On panpsychism, both the physical and the mental are inseparable and fundamental features of reality. Panentheism has also become immensely popular in the philosophy of religion. Panentheism strives for a higher reconciliation of an atheistic pantheism, on which the universe itself is causa sui, and the ontological dualism of necessarily existing, eternal creator and contingent, finite creation. Historically and systematically, panpsychism and panentheism often went together as essential parts of an all-embracing metaphysical theory of Being. The present collection of essays analyses the relation between panpsychism and panentheism and provides critical reflections on the significance of panpsychistic and panentheistic thinking for recent debates in philosophy and theology.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy this book Find it on Amazon.com
ISBN(s) 3957431719   9783957431714
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,231
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
Chapters BETA

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Why Spinoza Was Not a Panentheist.Amihud Gilead - 2021 - Philosophia 49 (5):2041-2051.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Naïve Panentheism.Karl Pfeifer - 2020 - In Godehard Brüntrup, Benedikt Paul Göcke & Ludwig Jaskolla (eds.), Panentheism and Panpsychism: Philosophy of Religion Meets Philosophy of Mind. Paderborn: pp. 123-138.
Holm Tetens on Panentheism: The Concept of Panentheism, Sin, and Special Divine Action.Benedikt Paul Göcke & Ludwig Jaskolla - 2017 - Neue Zeitschrift für Systematicsche Theologie Und Religionsphilosophie 59 (4):482-494.
Panpsychism in the search of a self-definition. [REVIEW]Igor G. Gasparov - 2018 - Epistemology and Philosophy of Science 55 (2):212-219.
Is Panentheism Naturalistic? How Panentheistic Conceptions of Divine Action Imply Dualism.Mikael Leidenhag - 2014 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 19 (2):209-225.
Wissenschaft Ist Panentheismus.Benedikt Paul Göcke - 2011 - In Göcke Benedikt Paul & Wasmaier-Sailer Margit (eds.), Idealismus und natürliche Theologie. Verlag Karl Alber.
Against Mereological Panentheism.Oliver D. Crisp - 2019 - European Journal for Philosophy of Religion 11 (2):23-41.
Panpsychism.Brüntrup Godehard & Jaskolla Ludwig (eds.) - 2017 - Oxford University Press.
Panpsychism.Ludwig Brüntrup, Jaskolla, Godehard (ed.) - 2016 - Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-05-21

Total views
8 ( #1,010,087 of 2,518,445 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #206,034 of 2,518,445 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes