All Animals are Equal, but Some More than Others?

Journal of Moral Philosophy 17 (3):342-357 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Does the moral badness of pain depend on who feels it? A common, but generally only implicitly stated view, is that it does not. This view, ‘unitarianism’, maintains that the same interests of different beings should count equally in our moral calculus. Shelly Kagan’s project in How to Count Animals, more or less is to reject this common view, and develop an alternative to it: a hierarchical view of moral status, on which the badness of pain does depend on who feels it. In this review essay, we critically examine Kagan’s argument for status hierarchy. In particular, we reject two of the central premises in his argument: that moral standing is ultimately grounded in agency and that unitarianism is overdemanding. We conclude that moral status may, despite Kagan’s compelling argument to the contrary, not be hierarchical.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

For Hierarchy in Animal Ethics.Shelly Kagan - 2018 - Journal of Practical Ethics 6 (1):1-18.
How to Count Animals, More or Less.Shelly Kagan - 2019 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hsiao on the Moral Status of Animals: Two Simple Responses.Timothy Perrine - 2019 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 32 (5):927-933.
The Moral Status of Animals.Scott David Wilson - 2002 - Dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara
Speciesism and moral status.Peter Singer - 2009 - Metaphilosophy 40 (3-4):567-581.
Moral agency in other animals.Paul Shapiro - 2006 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (4):357-373.
Moral Vegetarianism from a Very Broad Basis.David DeGrazia - 2009 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 6 (2):143-165.
Why Speciesism is Wrong: A Response to Kagan.Peter Singer - 2015 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 33 (1):31-35.
Is equal moral consideration really compatible with unequal moral status?John Rossi - 2010 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 20 (3):251-276.
On ‘Modal Personism’.Jeff McMahan - 2015 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 33 (1):26-30.
Aristotle and the Moral Status of Animals.Corinne Painter - 2006 - Philosophy in the Contemporary World 13 (2):45-57.

Analytics

Added to PP
2020-06-11

Downloads
1,275 (#9,420)

6 months
412 (#4,295)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Huub Brouwer
Tilburg University
Willem van der Deijl
Tilburg University

Citations of this work

Moral Status, Luck, and Modal Capacities: Debating Shelly Kagan.Harry R. Lloyd - 2021 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 38 (2):273-287.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 2004 - Univ of California Press.
The limits of morality.Shelly Kagan - 1989 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The case for animal rights.Tom Regan - 1985 - In Steven M. Cahn (ed.), Exploring ethics: an introductory anthology. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 425-434.
The Case for Animal Rights.Tom Regan - 1985 - Human Studies 8 (4):389-392.
How to Count Animals, More or Less.Shelly Kagan - 2019 - Oxford: Oxford University Press.

View all 18 references / Add more references