A Buddha Land in This World: Philosophy, Utopia, and Radical Buddhism

Earth: punctum (2022)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the early twentieth century, Uchiyama Gudō, Seno’o Girō, Lin Qiuwu, and others advocated a Buddhism that was radical in two respects. Firstly, they adopted a more or less naturalist stance with respect to Buddhist doctrine and related matters, rejecting karma or other supernatural beliefs. And secondly, they held political and economic views that were radically anti-hegemonic, anti-capitalist, and revolutionary. Taking the idea of such a “radical Buddhism” seriously, A Buddha Land in This World: Philosophy, Utopia, and Radical Buddhism asks whether it is possible to develop a philosophy that is simultaneously naturalist, anti-capitalist, Buddhist, and consistent. Rather than a study of radical Buddhism, then, this book is an attempt to radicalize it.     The foundations of this “radicalized radical Buddhism” are provided by a realist interpretation of Yogācāra, elucidated and elaborated with some help from thinkers in the broader Tiantai/Tendai tradition and American philosophers Donald Davidson and W.V.O. Quine. A key implication of this foundation is that only this world and only this life are real, from which it follows that if Buddhism aims to alleviate suffering, it has to do so in this world and in this life. Twentieth-century radical Buddhists (as well as some engaged Buddhists) came to a similar conclusion, often expressed in their aim to realize “a Buddha land in this world.”     Building on this foundation, but also on Mahāyāna moral philosophy, this book argues for an ethics and social philosophy based on a definition of evil as that what is or should be expected to cause death or suffering. On that ground, capitalism should be rejected indeed, but utopianism must be treated with caution as well, which raises questions about what it means – from a radicalized radical Buddhist perspective – to aim for a Buddha land in this world.

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Buddhism and Women.Gurmeet Kaur - 2021 - Buddhism: The Basics and Bloomsbury Religion in North America Full Title List.
Buddhism: A Philosophical Approach.Cyrus Panjvani - 2013 - Buffalo, NY, USA: Broadview Press.
Idealism and yogacara buddhism.Saam Trivedi - 2005 - Asian Philosophy 15 (3):231 – 246.
Buddhism in Perspective.Moti Lal Pandit - 2001 - Munshirm Manoharlal Pub Pvt.
Philosophy of the Buddha.Archie J. Bahm - 1958 - Barkeley, Calif.: Asian Humanities Press.
A defense of yogācāra buddhism.Alex Wayman - 1996 - Philosophy East and West 46 (4):447-476.
A Study of Relationship between Shinto and Japanese Buddhism.Toji Kamata - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 6:113-118.
Introducing Buddha.Jane Hope - 1998 - New York: Totem Books. Edited by Borin Van Loon & Richard Appignanesi.
Philosophy of the Buddha. [REVIEW]L. M. T. - 1959 - Review of Metaphysics 13 (2):354-354.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-04-14

Downloads
983 (#12,577)

6 months
362 (#4,589)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lajos L. Brons
University of Groningen (PhD)

Citations of this work

What is Real?Lajos L. Brons - 2023 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 30 (2):182–220.
Nowak, Models, and the Lessons of Neo-Kantianism.Stephen Turner - 2023 - Organon F: Medzinárodný Časopis Pre Analytickú Filozofiu 30 (2):165-170.

Add more citations

References found in this work

What is it like to be a bat?Thomas Nagel - 1974 - Philosophical Review 83 (October):435-50.
Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1962 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.
Actions, Reasons, and Causes.Donald Davidson - 1963 - Journal of Philosophy 60 (23):685.
Pragmatism: A New Name for Some Old Ways of Thinking.William James - 2019 - Gorham, ME: Timely Classics in Education. Edited by Eric C. Sheffield.
Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility.Harry G. Frankfurt - 1969 - Journal of Philosophy 66 (23):829-839.

View all 73 references / Add more references