A critique of pragmatism and deliberative democracy


Authors
Thom Brooks
Durham University
Abstract
This paper offers two potential worries in Robert B. Talisse's A Pragmatist Philosophy of Democracy. The first worry is that is that the picture of democracy on offer is incomplete. While Talisse correctly argues that democracy is about more than elections, democracy is also about more than deliberation between citizens. Talisse's deliberative democracy is problematic to the degree its view of deliberation fails to account for democracy. The second worry we may have concerns the relationship between Talisse's Peircean pragmatism and deliberative democracy. If this pragmatism is always open to revision and change in light of future evidence, then no pragmatist should adhere to only one particular political system, such as democracy. When we claim that only one system can ever be justified, then we fail to honour our professed openness to revision and change in the future. If my analysis is correct, then I do not aim to demonstrate that Talisse's Peircean pragmatism is incorrect, only incomplete. Thus, the hope of this paper is to help develop this pragmatism further.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2979/TRA.2009.45.1.50
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 44,455
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Toward a New Pragmatist Politics.Robert B. Talisse - 2011 - Metaphilosophy 42 (5):552-571.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
138 ( #57,035 of 2,272,564 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #409,116 of 2,272,564 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature