A critique of the disturbance theory of indeterminacy in quantum mechanics

Foundations of Physics 11 (1-2):1-20 (1981)

Authors
Harvey Brown
Oxford University
Abstract
Heisenberg'sgendanken experiments in quantum mechanics have given rise to a widespread belief that the indeterminacy relations holding for the variables of a quantal system can be explained quasiclassically in terms of a disturbance suffered by the system in interaction with a quantal measurement, or state preparation, agent. There are a number of criticisms of this doctrine in the literature, which are critically examined in this article and found to be ininconclusive, the chief error being the conflation of this disturbance with the projection postulate. We present a critique of the disturbance theory based on the fact that the required disturbance will in general depend on the interaction time of the system and state-preparer. This point is exploited in the construction of a spin-interaction model which acts as a counterexample to the disturbance doctrine, while remaining faithful to the spirit of Heisenberg'sgedanken experiments. Several consequences of this result are discussed
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00715192
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,645
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory.Werner Heisenberg - 1930 - Chicago: Ill., The University of Chicago Press.
The Logical Analysis of Quantum Mechanics.E. Scheibe - 1974 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 25 (4):352-358.
Measurements and Quantum States: Part I.Henry Margenau - 1963 - Philosophy of Science 30 (1):1-16.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Holism in Microphysics.Silvio Seno Chibeni - 2004 - Epistemologia 27 (2):227-244.
Philosophen in der Mikrowelt — Ratlos?Manfred Stöckler - 1986 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 17 (1):68-95.
Philosophen in der Mikrowelt — ratlos?Manfred Stöckler - 1986 - Zeitschrift Für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 17 (1):68-95.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Minimal Disturbance in Quantum Logic.Sergio Martinez - 1988 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1988:83 - 88.
The Concept of Transition in Quantum Mechanics.James L. Park - 1970 - Foundations of Physics 1 (1):23-33.
Quantum Mechanics and Metaphysical Indeterminacy.George Darby - 2010 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 88 (2):227-245.
The Meaning of the Interaction-Free Measurements.Lev Vaidman - 2003 - Foundations of Physics 33 (3):491-510.
How to Solve the Measurement Problem of Quantum Mechanics.Jeffrey Bub - 1988 - Foundations of Physics 18 (7):701-722.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-11-22

Total views
26 ( #294,389 of 2,325,995 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #534,295 of 2,325,995 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature