Applied Legal History: Demystifying the Doctrine of Odious Debts

Theoretical Inquiries in Law 11 (1):247-281 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

"Odious debts" have been the subject of debate in academic, activist, and policymaking circles in recent years. The term refers to the debts of a nation that a despotic leader incurs against the interests of the populace. When the despot is overthrown, the new government — understandably — does not wish to repay creditors who helped prop up the despot. One argument has focused on whether customary international law supports a "doctrine" of odious debts that justifies the nonpayment of sovereign debts when three conditions are met: the debts were incurred by a despotic ruler ; the funds were used in ways that did not benefit the populace; and the creditors were aware of the likely illegality of the loans. Advocates of this doctrine, which was synthesized by Alexander Sack in 1927, typically cite two examples of U.S. state practice for support: the negotiations between the United States and Spain following the Spanish-American War, in which the United States repudiated Cuba’s colonial debt, and the Tinoco arbitration, which repudiated certain debts of the deposed Costa Rican dictator, Frederico Tinoco. Those historical precedents do not support the first condition of Sack’s doctrine of odious debts, but do support the second two requirements. In addition to these two instances, United States history is rich with examples of debt repudiation by states. Those examples suggest a doctrine of odious debts that is broader and more flexible than the one written by Sack. Indeed, it may be appropriate to speak of the doctrines of odious debts.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 90,616

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Odious Debts: A Moral Account.Cristian Dimitriu - 2015 - Jurisprudence 6 (3):470-491.
Agency law and odious debts.Cristian Dimitriu - 2017 - Ethics and Global Politics 10 (1):77-97.
Toward a theory of moral debt:(I)The idea of moral debt in the common understanding.Morris B. Storer - 1971 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 14 (1-4):355-385.
Should They Honor the Promises of Their Parents' Leaders?Axel Gosseries - 2007 - Ethics and International Affairs 21 (s1):99-125.
'Bad Debts' and the Human Condition.Nicholas Sagovsky - 2001 - Studies in Christian Ethics 14 (1):81-91.
Risks of Lending and Liability to Others.Kunibert Raffer - 2007 - Ethics and International Affairs 21 (1):85–106.
Institutions and Debts of Gratitude.Scott C. Lowe - 1992 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 7 (2):57-62.
The Problem of Unresolved Wrongdoing.Kenneth Einar Himma - 2010 - Faith and Philosophy 27 (4):405-422.
Personal Bankruptcy in Korea: Challenges and Responses.Soogeun Oh - 2006 - Theoretical Inquiries in Law 7 (2):597-624.

Analytics

Added to PP
2017-12-14

Downloads
13 (#886,827)

6 months
5 (#247,092)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Denouncing Odious Debts.Stephanie Collet & Kim Oosterlinck - 2019 - Journal of Business Ethics 160 (1):205-223.
The Hausmann–Gorky Effect.Mitu Gulati & Ugo Panizza - 2020 - Journal of Business Ethics 166 (1):175-195.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references