Journal of Business Ethics 11 (2):105 - 114 (1992)
N. Scott Arnold has argued forcefully that, for the most part, those who win profits (and suffer losses) in a market economy deserve them. According to Arnold, profit opportunities arise when there are malallocations of resources, which entrepreneurs initiate changes in production to correct. If they succeed, they simultaneously further the essential point of the market system — to meet the needs and wants of consumers — and they make profits; if they do not, then they stand to suffer losses. I argue that the structure of modern corporate enterprises tends to channel income into the hands of those whose entrepreneurial contribution is diminishingly small — namely stockholders — and away from those within the firm who genuinely participate in the entrepreneurial role.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Corporate Profit, Entrepreneurship Theory and Business Ethics.Radu Vranceanu - 2014 - Business Ethics: A European Review 23 (1):50-68.
Similar books and articles
Managing Business Ethics and Opportunity Costs.Patrick Primeaux & John Stieber - 1997 - Journal of Business Ethics 16 (8):835-842.
Entrepreneurs, Profits, and Deserving Market Shares.John Christman - 1988 - Social Philosophy and Policy 6 (1):1.
Luca Pacioli on Business Profits.Michael J. Fischer - 2000 - Journal of Business Ethics 25 (4):299 - 312.
Profits and Principles: Four Perspectives. [REVIEW]Johan J. Graafland - 2002 - Journal of Business Ethics 35 (4):293 - 305.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads30 ( #173,029 of 2,178,208 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #112,488 of 2,178,208 )
How can I increase my downloads?