A secret paradox of the common law

Law and Philosophy 2 (2):193 - 232 (1983)
This essay recounts a fascinating if complicated piece of Anglo-American debate. My aim is to reach a conclusion about the importance of the notion of changing one's normative position as part of the act of giving sufficient consideration for a legal contract. In several journals and textbooks between 1894 and 1918 the major contract scholars of the time, e.g., Langdell, Anson, Pollock, Williston, Ames, and Corbin, discussed a special example which was thought to reveal a paradox in the common law of consideration. The problem had shown itself in the textbooks of Pollock in England and Langdell in the United States. The example is of two contracts made by three persons in which one contract with the third party repeats the content of an existing contract with the second party. It would appear that the party at the pivot experiences no new detriment in merely performing, or promising to perform, his pre-existing duty. If so, such oblique contracts with third parties must fail for want of consideration extended from the first party. About this difficulty the experts were anything but agreed. The cases were not consistent. At the root of this uncertainty is an ambivalence about the concept of consideration itself. Should it be conceived in terms of normative relations and changes of moral position or should it be conceived in valuative terms, as harms and benefits? The differences of opinion about the legal validity of oblique contracts is explained by this ambiguity, one which the common lawyer has not yet resolved.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00144448
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,727
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Legally Enforceable Commitments.Michael D. Bayles - 1985 - Law and Philosophy 4 (3):311 - 342.
Ethics of Contract Pricing.Daniel T. Ostas - 1992 - Journal of Business Ethics 11 (2):137 - 145.
Secret Law and the Value of Publicity.Christopher Kutz - 2009 - Ratio Juris 22 (2):197-217.
Contracts.Brian Bix - 2010 - In Franklin G. Miller & Alan Wertheimer (eds.), The Ethics of Consent: Theory and Practice. Oxford University Press.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
23 ( #226,176 of 2,197,333 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #299,047 of 2,197,333 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature