Journal of Social Philosophy 39 (4):666-669 (2008)

Authors
Thom Brooks
Durham University
Abstract
This paper argues that Leif Wenar's theory of reparations is not purely forward-looking and that backward-looking considerations play an important role: if there had never been a past injustice, then reparations for the future cannot be acceptable. Past injustice compose the first part of a two-tiered theory of reparations. We must first discover a past injustice has taken place: reparations are for the repair of previous damage. However, for Wenar, not all past injustices warrant reparations. Once we have first passed the initial test of demonstrating a past injustice has taken place, we then determine whether or not to finally accept reparations based upon forward-looking considerations. What is important to note is that this decision to award reparations is based upon forward-looking considerations, but only after first satisfying the test of a past injustice. Thus, backward-looking considerations make up an important first part of Wenar's two-tiered theory of reparations. It is not my argument that this theory is unsafe and I find Wenar's arguments both novel and highly compelling. However, the view that this theory is forward-looking -- and not backward-looking -- is not entirely accurate. My brief reply corrects this part of an important new theory of reparations in the hope of strengthening its persuasive power.
Keywords reparations  Wenar  global justice
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1467-9833.2008.00449.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,229
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Corrective Vs. Distributive Justice: The Case of Apologies.Andrew I. Cohen - 2016 - Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 19 (3):663-677.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reconciliation and Reparations.Howard Mcgary - 2010 - Metaphilosophy 41 (4):546-562.
Reparations in Democratic Transitions.Ernesto Verdeja - 2006 - Res Publica 12 (2):115-136.
Reparations: Interdisciplinary Inquiries.Jon Miller & Rahul Kumar (eds.) - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
The Handbook of Reparations.De Greiff Pablo (ed.) - 2006 - Oxford University Press.
Reparations and Racial Inequality.Derrick Darby - 2010 - Philosophy Compass 5 (1):55-66.
Sartre, Fanon, and the Case for Slavery Reparations.Chris Buck - 2004 - Sartre Studies International 10 (2):123-138.
Reparations for the Future.Leif Wenar - 2006 - Journal of Social Philosophy 37 (3):396–405.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
64 ( #168,920 of 2,455,592 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #225,855 of 2,455,592 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes