Synthese 200 (2):1-29 (2022)
AbstractThis paper argues that there exists a collective epistemic state of ‘Broad Medical Uncertainty’ regarding the effectiveness of many medical interventions. We outline the features of BMU, and describe some of the main contributing factors. These include flaws in medical research methodologies, bias in publication practices, financial and other conflicts of interest, and features of how evidence is translated into practice. These result in a significant degree of uncertainty regarding the effectiveness of many medical treatments and unduly optimistic beliefs about the benefit/harm profiles of such treatments. We argue for an ethical presumption in favour of openness regarding BMU as part of a ‘Corrective Response’. We then consider some objections to this position, including concerns that public honesty about flaws in medical research could undermine trust in healthcare institutions. We suggest that, as it stands, the Anti-Corrective Response is unconvincing.
Similar books and articles
The Ethical Imperative of Medical Humanities.Geoffrey Rees - 2010 - Journal of Medical Humanities 31 (4):267-277.
Patients' Ethical Obligation for Their Health.R. C. Sider & C. D. Clements - 1984 - Journal of Medical Ethics 10 (3):138-142.
The Ethics of Uncertainty: Entangled Ethical and Epistemic Risks in Disorders of Consciousness.L. Syd M. Johnson - 2021 - New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
Corporate Social Responsibility: An Old Wine in a New Gourd.Husein Inusah - 2019 - Journal of Philosophy and Culture 7 (1):1-6.
Health Care in Contexts of Risk, Uncertainty, and Hybridity – Introduction to the Volume.Daniel Messelken & David T. Winkler - 2021 - In Daniel Messelken & David Winkler (eds.), Health Care in Contexts of Risk, Uncertainty, and Hybridity. Springer. pp. 1-15.
Chance and Uncertainty: Their Role in Various Disciplines.H. W. Capel, J. S. Cramer, O. Estevez-Uscanga, C. A. J. Klaassen & G. J. Mellenbergh (eds.) - 1995 - Amsterdam University Press.
Epistemic Humility and Medical Practice: Translating Epistemic Categories Into Ethical Obligations.A. Schwab - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (1):28-48.
RETRACTED: Fueling Doubt and Openness: Experiencing the Unconscious, Constructed Nature of Perception Induces Uncertainty and Openness to Change.William Hart, Alexa M. Tullett, Wyley B. Shreves & Zachary Fetterman - 2015 - Cognition 137 (C):1-8.
Neonatal Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO): Clinical Trials and the Ethics of Evidence.V. Mike, A. N. Krauss & G. S. Ross - 1993 - Journal of Medical Ethics 19 (4):212-218.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Lying, Misleading, and What is Said: An Exploration in Philosophy of Language and in Ethics.Jennifer Mather Saul - 2012 - Oxford University Press.
Due Deference to Denialism: Explaining Ordinary People’s Rejection of Established Scientific Findings.Neil Levy - 2019 - Synthese 196 (1):313-327.
Epistemic Trust and the Ethics of Science Communication: Against Transparency, Openness, Sincerity and Honesty.Stephen John - 2018 - Social Epistemology 32 (2):75-87.
Experimentation by Industrial Selection.Bennett Holman & Justin Bruner - 2017 - Philosophy of Science 84 (5):1008-1019.