Authors
Abstract
Argumentamos en este trabajo que es necesario poseer ciertos conceptos normativos como el de daño para reconocer y hacer visibles situaciones de daño. A cambio, sostenemos una noción de concepto normativo que involucra reacciones emocionales y compromisos con la situación que es conceptualizada. El marco que da sentido a la idea de concepto normativo es lo que se califica como mente corporeizada.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,431
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Mal, daño y justicia.Carlos Thiebaut - 2005 - Azafea: Revista de Filosofia 7 (1).
Revenge.Robert J. Stainton - 2006 - Critica 38 (112):3-20.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-11-17

Total views
6 ( #1,050,922 of 2,371,808 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #557,530 of 2,371,808 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes