Authors
Jessica Brown
University of St. Andrews
Abstract
Following Burge, many anti-individualists suppose that a subject can possess a concept even if she incompletely understands it. While agreeing that this is possible, I argue that there is a limit on the extent to which a subject can incompletely understand the set of concepts she thinks with. This limit derives from our conception of our ability to reflectively evaluate our own thoughts or, as Burge puts it, our ability to engage in critical reasoning. The paper extends Burge’s own work on critical reasoning. He argued that critical reasoning imposes a limit on the extent to which we can be mistaken about what thoughts we are having; in general, we can know non-empirically what we are thinking . He does not explicitly consider whether critical reasoning also imposes a limit on incomplete understanding of thoughts
Keywords Epistemology  Reasoning  Self-knowledge  Understanding  Burge, T
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 0031-8205
DOI 10.2307/2653617
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,132
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Self-Knowledge and Knowledge of Content.Åsa Maria Wikforss - 2008 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 38 (3):399-424.
Brown on Self-Knowledge and Discriminability1.Sanford C. Goldberg - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (3):301-314.
Externalism and Incomplete Understanding.Asa Maria Wikforss - 2004 - Philosophical Quarterly 54 (215):287-294.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
170 ( #63,162 of 2,454,729 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #226,106 of 2,454,729 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes