Disclosure and Consent to Medical Research Participation

Journal of Moral Philosophy 10 (4):195-219 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Most regulations and guidelines require that potential research participants be told a great deal of information during the consent process. Many of these documents, and most of the scholars who consider the consent process, assume that all this information must be disclosed because it must all be understood. However, a wide range of studies surveying apparently competent participants in clinical trials around the world show that many do not understand key aspects of what they have been told. The standard view of the conditions for valid consent therefore implies that these people have failed to give valid consent to research participation. In this paper we argue that the standard view is false. The primary function of the requirement that researchers disclose information about a study is the avoidance of illegitimate control over someone’s consent decision, which is a form of fraud.We derive the content and manner of appropriate disclosure by analysing the ways in which the manipulation of information can invalidate consent. Our analysis shows that the informational requirements for valid consent are conceptually distinct and thus unlikely to have identical contents. This implies that consent can be valid when not everything that ought to be disclosed by the person asking for consent is understood by the person who proffers it

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-04-26

Downloads
1,215 (#11,003)

6 months
157 (#27,226)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Danielle Bromwich
University of Leeds
Joseph Millum
University of St. Andrews

Citations of this work

Understanding, Communication, and Consent.Joseph Millum & Danielle Bromwich - 2018 - Ergo: An Open Access Journal of Philosophy 5:45-68.
Informed Consent, Disclosure, and Understanding.Tom Dougherty - 2020 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 48 (2):119-150.
Sex By Deception.Berit Brogaard - 2022 - In Manuel Vargas & John Doris (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Moral Psychology. Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press. pp. 683-711.

View all 16 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

Well-Being.Roger Crisp - 2014 - In Edward N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Stanford, CA: The Metaphysics Research Lab.
Well-being.Roger Crisp - 2013 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
The Many Faces of Competency.James F. Drane - 2012 - Hastings Center Report 15 (2):17-21.

Add more references