Do Higher-Order Music Ontologies Rest on a Mistake?

British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (2):169-184 (2011)
Abstract
Recent work in the ontology of music suggests that we will avoid confusion if we distinguish between two kinds of question that are typically posed in music ontology. Thus, a distinction has been made between fundamental ontology and higher-order ontology. The former addresses questions about the basic metaphysical options from which ontologists choose. For instance, are musical works types, indicated types, classes of particulars, or some other kind of entity? Higher-order ontology addresses the question of what lies ‘at the centre’ of a specific form of music, such as rock or jazz—or perhaps classical music. The argument of this essay is, first, that a close examination of the best efforts in two of these territories shows that they have the effect of pressing the music in each sphere into implausible Procrustean beds. Second, it is argued that the general question that higher-order ontologies pose, that is, ‘What work-kind is it that lies at the centre of a given kind of music, F?’ is a question based on a mistaken but seductive assumption, namely that the concept of the work of F has actual application. In fact, these concepts—upon which higher-order ontology depends—are mere artefacts of philosophy. The question is also addressed why the assumption is so seductive. Finally, the question finally is posed about what, if anything, is implied from the foregoing about the traditional ontology of classical music
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/aesthj/ayr002
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 28,106
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
The Ontology of Musical Works: A Philosophical Pseudo-Problem.James Young - 2011 - Frontiers of Philosophy in China 6 (2):284-297.
Music & Meaning.Jenefer Robinson (ed.) - 1997 - Cornell University Press.
The Philosophy of Music.Andrew Kania - 2008 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Musical Works: Ontology and Meta-Ontology.Julian Dodd - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (6):1113-1134.
Music Without Metaphysics?Christopher Bartel - 2011 - British Journal of Aesthetics 51 (4):383-398.
What Do We Hear When We Hear Music?Ruud Welten - 2009 - Studia Phaenomenologica 9:269-286.
In Defence of Higher-Order Musical Ontology: A Reply to Lee B. Brown.A. Kania - 2012 - British Journal of Aesthetics 52 (1):97-102.
The Concept of Music.Robin Maconie - 1990 - Oxford University Press.
Musik und Zeit bei Kant.Susanne Herrmann-Sinai - 2009 - Kant-Studien 100 (4):427-453.
The Musical Work: Reality or Invention?Michael Talbot (ed.) - 2000 - Liverpool University Press.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2011-04-15

Total downloads

56 ( #94,042 of 2,171,704 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

1 ( #326,424 of 2,171,704 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums