Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (2):117-122 (2014)

Stephen Brown
Briar Cliff College
Chris Mitchell
Trent University
Background To determine whether fetal care paediatric and maternal–fetal medicine specialists harbour differing attitudes about pregnancy termination for congenital fetal conditions, their perceived responsibilities to pregnant women and fetuses, and the fetus as a patient and whether self-perceived primary responsibilities to fetuses and women and views about the fetus as a patient are associated with attitudes about clinical care.Methods Mail survey of 434 MFM and FCP specialists .Results MFMs were more likely than FCPs to disagree with these statements : ‘the presence of a fetal abnormality is not an appropriate reason for a couple to consider pregnancy termination’ ; ‘the effects that a child born with disabilities might have on marital and family relationships is not an appropriate reason for a couple to consider pregnancy termination’ ; and ‘the cost of healthcare for the future child is not an appropriate reason for a couple to consider pregnancy termination’ . 65% MFMs versus 47% FCPs disagreed that their professional responsibility is to focus primarily on fetal well-being . Specialists did not differ regarding the fetus as a separate patient. Responses about self-perceived responsibility to focus on fetal well-being were associated with clinical practice attitudes.Conclusions Independent of demographic and sociopolitical characteristics, FCPs and MFMs possess divergent ethical sensitivities regarding pregnancy termination, pregnant women and fetuses, which may influence clinical care
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1136/medethics-2012-101126
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 62,242
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

A Critique of the 'Fetus as Patient'.Anne Drapkin Lyerly, Margaret Olivia Little & Ruth R. Faden - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (7):42 – 44.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Perils of Protection: Vulnerability and Women in Clinical Research.Toby Schonfeld - 2013 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 34 (3):189-206.
Policing Pregnancy: The Law and Ethics of Obstetric Conflict. [REVIEW]Rodney Taylor - 2010 - Human Reproduction and Genetic Ethics 13 (1):38-38.
Minimal Risk in Research Involving Pregnant Women and Fetuses.Carson Strong - 2011 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 39 (3):529-538.
Attitudes of Women to Fetal Tissue Research.F. Anderson, A. Glasier, J. Ross & D. T. Baird - 1994 - Journal of Medical Ethics 20 (1):36-40.
Self-Ownership, Abortion and Infanticide.E. F. Paul & J. Paul - 1979 - Journal of Medical Ethics 5 (3):133-138.


Added to PP index

Total views
34 ( #316,800 of 2,444,762 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #457,287 of 2,444,762 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes