Digging Up, Dismantling, and Redesigning the Criminal Law

Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (1):169-178 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX


The criminal law raises wonderfully thorny foundational questions. Some of these questions are conceptual: What is a plausible conception of crime ? What is a plausible conception of criminal law ? Some of these questions are genealogical: What are the historical and genealogical roots of the criminal law in a particular jurisdiction? Other questions are evaluative: What are the political and moral values on which a given conception of criminal law depends? What kind of rational reconstruction, if any, could the criminal law be given? And, finally, still other questions are exploratory and normative: Should parts of existing criminal law be abandoned? What new topics in criminal law theory need to be addressed in our globalised, technologically savvy world? The contributors to Antony Duff and Stuart P. Green’s collection Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law tackle these questions with zeal and independent spirit. They disagree markedly with each other about what the foundational questions are. And, they disagree about how those questions should be handled. This article charts their disagreements by situating the contributors within two taxonomies. The first groups them according to their approaches to the foundational questions; the second groups them according to their modes of theorising. This double taxonomy provides a useful frame within which to analyse these competing takes on the philosophically foundational work of criminal law theory



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 92,075

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

International Criminal Law and Philosophy.Larry May & Zachary Hoskins (eds.) - 2010 - Cambridge University Press.
Philosophical foundations of criminal law.Antony Duff & Stuart P. Green (eds.) - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Philosophy and the criminal law: principle and critique.Antony Duff (ed.) - 1998 - New York: Cambridge University Press.
Theorizing Criminal Law Reform.Roger A. Shiner - 2009 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (2):167-186.
Towards a theory of criminal law?R. A. Duff - 2010 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 84 (1):1-28.
Why Criminal Law: A Question of Content? [REVIEW]Douglas Husak - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (2):99-122.
Action and value in criminal law.Stephen Shute, John Gardner & Jeremy Horder (eds.) - 1993 - New York: Oxford University Press.


Added to PP

44 (#362,012)

6 months
6 (#524,433)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Kimberley Brownlee
University of British Columbia

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Two concepts of rules.John Rawls - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (1):3-32.
Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law.R. A. Duff & Stuart Green (eds.) - 2011 - New York: Oxford University Press UK.

Add more references