Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (1):169-178 (2013)
The criminal law raises wonderfully thorny foundational questions. Some of these questions are conceptual: What is a plausible conception of crime ? What is a plausible conception of criminal law ? Some of these questions are genealogical: What are the historical and genealogical roots of the criminal law in a particular jurisdiction? Other questions are evaluative: What are the political and moral values on which a given conception of criminal law depends? What kind of rational reconstruction, if any, could the criminal law be given? And, finally, still other questions are exploratory and normative: Should parts of existing criminal law be abandoned? What new topics in criminal law theory need to be addressed in our globalised, technologically savvy world? The contributors to Antony Duff and Stuart P. Green’s collection Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law tackle these questions with zeal and independent spirit. They disagree markedly with each other about what the foundational questions are. And, they disagree about how those questions should be handled. This article charts their disagreements by situating the contributors within two taxonomies. The first groups them according to their approaches to the foundational questions; the second groups them according to their modes of theorising. This double taxonomy provides a useful frame within which to analyse these competing takes on the philosophically foundational work of criminal law theory
|Keywords||Criminal law Crime Foundations Genealogy Global justice International law Moral philosophy Political theory Processes Punishment New technologies|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
The Ends of Harm: The Moral Foundations of Criminal Law.Victor Tadros - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
International Criminal Law and Philosophy.Larry May & Zachary Hoskins (eds.) - 2010 - Cambridge University Press.
Philosophical Foundations of Criminal Law.Antony Duff & Stuart P. Green (eds.) - 2011 - Oxford University Press.
On the Relevance of Neuroscience to Criminal Responsibility.Nicole A. Vincent - 2010 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 4 (1):77-98.
Rethinking Criminal Law Theory: New Canadian Perspectives in the Philosophy of Domestic, Transnational, and International Criminal Law.François Tanguay-Renaud & James Stribopoulos (eds.) - 2012 - Hart Publishing.
Philosophy and the Criminal Law: Principle and Critique.Antony Duff (ed.) - 1998 - Cambridge University Press.
The Grammar of Criminal Law: American, Comparative, and International.George P. Fletcher - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Towards a Theory of Criminal Law?R. A. Duff - 2010 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 84 (1):1-28.
Why Criminal Law: A Question of Content? [REVIEW]Douglas Husak - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (2):99-122.
Action and Value in Criminal Law.Stephen Shute, John Gardner & Jeremy Horder (eds.) - 1993 - Oxford University Press.
The Philosophical Foundations of Extraterritorial Punishment.Alejandro Chehtman - 2010 - Oxford University Press.
Criminal Justice in a Democracy: Towards a Relational Conception of Criminal Law and Punishment. [REVIEW]René Foqué - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (3):207-227.
International Criminal Law : Between Utopian Dreams and Political Realities.Margaret Martin - 2012 - In François Tanguay-Renaud & James Stribopoulos (eds.), Rethinking Criminal Law Theory: New Canadian Perspectives in the Philosophy of Domestic, Transnational, and International Criminal Law. Hart Publishing.
Added to index2012-10-01
Total downloads14 ( #334,553 of 2,171,776 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,702 of 2,171,776 )
How can I increase my downloads?