Hume and the social contract

Philosophical Quarterly 28 (111):132-148 (1978)

Abstract
Doubts the adequacy of teh accounts of Humes' successful refutation of the theory of a social contract. Groups Humes' refutation into three arguments: 1) hardly any social contracts are idscernible in the hoistories of actual governments 2) contract theory must be wrong because it conflicts with ordinary people's views on the sunject 3) utilitarian Argues that it is doubtful whether any of these arguments or clusters of arguments really refutes contract theory; certainly, none achieves a refutation of the 'simple and overwhelming' kind so often attributed to Hume
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.2307/2219359
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,062
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Animals and the Social Contract.Kimberly K. Smith - 2008 - Environmental Ethics 30 (2):195-207.
Social Contracts and Corporations: A Reply to Hodapp. [REVIEW]Thomas Donaldson - 1990 - Journal of Business Ethics 9 (2):133 - 137.
Comment on Munoz-Dardé's'liberty's Chains'.Niko Kolodny - 2009 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 83 (1):197-212.
Psychological Contracts.Jeffery A. Thompson & David W. Hart - 2005 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 16:38-43.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
128 ( #52,824 of 2,320,272 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
18 ( #36,358 of 2,320,272 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature