Philosophical Quarterly 28 (111):132-148 (1978)
Doubts the adequacy of teh accounts of Humes' successful refutation of the theory of a social contract. Groups Humes' refutation into three arguments: 1) hardly any social contracts are idscernible in the hoistories of actual governments 2) contract theory must be wrong because it conflicts with ordinary people's views on the sunject 3) utilitarian Argues that it is doubtful whether any of these arguments or clusters of arguments really refutes contract theory; certainly, none achieves a refutation of the 'simple and overwhelming' kind so often attributed to Hume
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Comment on Munoz-Dardé's'liberty's Chains'.Niko Kolodny - 2009 - Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume 83 (1):197-212.
Social Contracts and Corporations: A Reply to Hodapp. [REVIEW]Thomas Donaldson - 1990 - Journal of Business Ethics 9 (2):133 - 137.
Renegotiating the Social Contract: Hobbes to Rawls.Deborah A. Kissinger - 2003 - Dissertation, University of Hawai'i
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads93 ( #53,732 of 2,152,644 )
Recent downloads (6 months)7 ( #105,084 of 2,152,644 )
How can I increase my downloads?