Informed consent to HIV cure research

Journal of Medical Ethics 43 (2):108-113 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Trials with highly unfavourable risk–benefit ratios for participants, like HIV cure trials, raise questions about the quality of the consent of research participants. Why, it may be asked, would a person with HIV who is doing well on antiretroviral therapy be willing to jeopardise his health by enrolling in such a trial? We distinguish three concerns: first, how information is communicated to potential participants; second, participants’ motivations for enrolling in potentially high risk research with no prospect of direct benefit; and third, participants’ understanding of the details of the trials in which they enrol. We argue that the communication concern is relevant to the validity of informed consent and the quality of decision making, that the motivation concern does not identify a genuine problem with either the validity of consent or the quality of decision making and that the understanding concern may not be relevant to the validity of consent but is relevant to the quality of decision making. In doing so, we derive guidance points for researchers recruiting and enrolling participants into their HIV cure trials, as well as the research ethics committees reviewing proposed studies.

Similar books and articles

Phase 1 oncology trials and informed consent.Franklin G. Miller & Steven Joffe - 2013 - Journal of Medical Ethics 39 (12):761-764.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-08-09

Downloads
802 (#21,371)

6 months
119 (#45,218)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Danielle Bromwich
University of Leeds
Joseph Millum
University of St. Andrews