History of Philosophy Quarterly 24 (4):317-336 (2007)

Authors
Susan Brower-Toland
Saint Louis University
Abstract
In this paper I challenge recent externalist interpretations of Ockham’s theory of intuitive cognition. I begin by distinguishing two distinct theses that defenders of the externalist interpretation typically attribute to Ockham: a ‘direct reference thesis’, according to which intuitive cognitions are states that lack all internal, descriptive content; and a ‘causal thesis’, according to which intuitive states are wholly determined by causal connections they bear to singular objects. I then argue that neither can be plausibly credited to Ockham. In particular, I claim that the causal thesis doesn’t square with Ockham’s account of supernaturally produced intuition and that the direct reference thesis sits uneasily with Ockham’s characterization of the intentional structure of intuitive states.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Intuitive and Abstractive Cognition.John Boler - 1982 - In Norman Kretzmann, Anthony Kenny & Jan Pinborg (eds.), Cambridge History of Later Medieval Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. pp. 460--478.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Ockham’s Weak Externalism.Philip Choi - 2016 - British Journal for the History of Philosophy 24 (6):1075-1096.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-08-06

Total views
436 ( #13,597 of 2,325,155 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
34 ( #19,195 of 2,325,155 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes