Is hypothetical consent a substitute for actual consent?


Abstract
The so-called Substituted Judgment Standard is one of several competing principles on how certain health care decisions ought to be made for patients who are not themselves capable of making decisions of the relevant kind. It says that a surrogate decision-maker, acting on behalf of the patient, ought to make the decision the patient would have made, had the latter been competent. The most common way of justifying the Substituted Judgment Standard is to maintain that this standard protects patients’ right to autonomy, or self-determination, in the situation where they are no longer able to exercise this right on their own. In this paper we question this justification, by arguing that the most commonly suggested moral reasons for allowing and encouraging people to make their own choices seem not to apply when the patient’s decision-making is merely hypothetical. We end with some brief sketches of possible alternative ways of justifying the Substituted Judgment Standard
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 39,566
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Some Comments on the Substituted Judgement Standard.Dan Egonsson - 2010 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 13 (1):33-40.
Determining Proxy Consent.Richard O'Neil - 1983 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (4):389-403.
Living Wills and Substituted Judgments: A Critical Analysis.Jos V. M. Welie - 2001 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 4 (2):169-183.
Proxy Consent and Counterfactual Wishes.Edward Wierenga - 1983 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (4):405-416.
Relatives' Knowledge of Decision Making in Intensive Care.M. G. Booth - 2004 - Journal of Medical Ethics 30 (5):459-461.
Substituted Judgment, Best Interests, and the Need for Best Respect.Susan R. Martyn - 1994 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 3 (2):195.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2016-03-19

Total views
5 ( #920,448 of 2,325,859 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #922,770 of 2,325,859 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature