Health Care Analysis 27 (2):61-76 (2019)
AbstractMany countries tightly ration access to publicly funded fertility treatments such as in vitro fertilisation. One basis for excluding people from access to IVF is their body mass index. In this paper, I consider a number of potential justifications for such a policy, based on claims about effectiveness and cost-efficiency, and reject these as unsupported by available evidence. I consider an alternative justification: that those whose subfertility results from avoidable behaviours for which they are responsible are less deserving of treatment. I ultimately stop short of endorsing or rejecting such a justification, though highlight some reasons for thinking it is unlikely to be practicable.
Similar books and articles
Voluntary sterilisation and access to IVF in Québec.Katharine Browne - 2018 - Journal of Medical Ethics 44 (4):262-265.
Three questions about engagement and exclusion in responsible investment.Ivar Kolstad - 2016 - Business Ethics: A European Review 25 (1):45-58.
Insuring Against Infertility: Expanding State Infertility Mandates to Include Fertility Preservation Technology for Cancer Patients.Daniel Basco, Lisa Campo-Engelstein & Sarah Rodriguez - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (4):832-839.
Should Fertility Treatment be State Funded?Emily McTernan - 2015 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 32 (3):227-240.
NICE, the draft fertility guideline and dodging the big question.J. R. McMillan - 2003 - Journal of Medical Ethics 29 (6):313-314.
Childhood obesity and co‐morbid problems: effects of Epstein's family‐based behavioural treatment in an Icelandic sample.Thrudur Gunnarsdottir, Urdur Njardvik, Anna S. Olafsdottir, Linda Craighead & Ragnar Bjarnason - 2012 - Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice 18 (2):465-472.
Trends in Childhood Obesity Research: A Brief Analysis of NIH-Supported Efforts.Terry T.-K. Huang & Mary N. Horlick - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (1):148-153.
Cost-equivalence and Pluralism in Publicly-funded Health-care Systems.Dominic Wilkinson & Julian Savulescu - 2018 - Health Care Analysis 26 (4):287-309.
Money in--babies out: assessing the long-term economic impact of IVF-conceived children.M. Connolly, S. Hoorens & W. Ledger - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (9):653-654.
Interventionism and Causal Exclusion.James Woodward - 2015 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 91 (2):303-347.
The Controversy Over Pediatric Bariatric Surgery: An Explorative Study on Attitudes and Normative Beliefs of Specialists, Parents, and Adolescents With Obesity.Stefan M. van Geelen, Ineke L. E. Bolt, Olga H. van der Baan-Slootweg & Marieke J. H. van Summeren - 2013 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 10 (2):227-237.
The demand for effectiveness, efficiency and equity of health care.Gavin Mooney - 1989 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 10 (3).
Response to “Entitlement to Cloning” by Timothy Murphy (CQ Vol 8, No 3) and “Cloning and Infertility” by Carson Strong (CQ Vol 7, No 3). [REVIEW]Jean E. Chambers - 2001 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 10 (2):194-204.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
Passport to freedom? Immunity passports for COVID-19.Rebecca C. H. Brown, Julian Savulescu, Bridget Williams & Dominic Wilkinson - 2020 - Journal of Medical Ethics 46 (10):652-659.
Age-discriminated IVF Access and Evidence-based Ageism: Is There a Better Way?James Rupert Fletcher & Giulia Cavaliere - 2022 - Science, Technology, and Human Values 47 (5):986-1010.
References found in this work
Reasons and Persons.Joseph Margolis - 1986 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 47 (2):311-327.
Surveying Freedom: Folk Intuitions about free will and moral responsibility.Eddy Nahmias, Stephen Morris, Thomas Nadelhoffer & Jason Turner - 2005 - Philosophical Psychology 18 (5):561-584.
Responsibility and Control: A Theory of Moral Responsibility.John Martin Fischer & Mark Ravizza - 1999 - Philosophical Quarterly 49 (197):543-545.