Legal obligation as a duty of deference

Law and Philosophy 27 (6):583 - 597 (2008)
An enduring question in political and legal philosophy concerns whether we have a general moral obligation to follow the law. In this paper, I argue that Philip Soper’s intuitively appealing effort to give new life to the idea of legal obligation by characterising it as a duty of deference is ultimately unpersuasive. Soper claims that people who understand what a legal system is and admit that it is valuable must recognise that they would be morally inconsistent to deny that they owe deference to state norms. However, if the duty of deference stemmed from people’s decision to regard the law as valuable as Soper argues, then people who do not admit the value of the state would have no duty as such to defer to its norms. And, more importantly, people who admit the value of the state would have a duty not to defer to particular norms, namely those norms which violate the values that ground their preference for a state. This critique of Soper operates within his parameters by accepting his claim that moral consistency generates reasons to act. Even on those terms, Soper’s defence of legal obligation as a duty of deference is unpersuasive.
Keywords Deference  Duty  Law  Legal obligation  Moral consistency  Political obligation  Self-respect  Philip Soper
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s10982-008-9028-8
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,781
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
For Better or For Worse.Florian Wettstein - 2010 - Business Ethics Quarterly 20 (2):275-283.
A Duty to Participate in Research: Does Social Context Matter?Inmaculada de Melo-Mart - 2008 - American Journal of Bioethics 8 (10):28 – 36.
Responsibility in Negligence: Why the Duty of Care is Not a Duty “To Try”.Ori J. Herstein - 2010 - Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 23 (2):403-428.
Billy Budd and the Duty to Enforce the Law.Carl Cranor - 1985 - Philosophy Research Archives 11:245-268.
Is There a Duty to Die?John Hardwig - 1997 - Hastings Center Report 27 (2):34-42.
State Legitimacy and Self-Defence.Massimo Renzo - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (5):575-601.
Added to PP index

Total downloads
84 ( #64,591 of 2,199,426 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #149,211 of 2,199,426 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature