In Dennis Dieks (ed.), The Ontology of Spacetime. Elsevier. pp. 67--89 (2004)

Authors
Oliver Pooley
Oxford University
Harvey Brown
Oxford University
Abstract
It is argued that Minkowski space-time cannot serve as the deep structure within a ``constructive'' version of the special theory of relativity, contrary to widespread opinion in the philosophical community.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2006
DOI 10.1016/s1871-1774(06)01004-7
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 53,013
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Presentism and Relativity. [REVIEW]Yuri Balashov & Michel Janssen - 2003 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 54 (2):327-346.
Relationalism Rehabilitated? I: Classical Mechanics.Oliver Pooley & Harvey R. Brown - 2002 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 53 (2):183--204.

View all 19 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Are There Non-Causal Explanations (of Particular Events)?Brdford Skow - 2013 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science (3):axs047.
Are There Non-Causal Explanations (of Particular Events)?Brdford Skow - 2014 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 65 (3):445-467.
Drawing the Line Between Kinematics and Dynamics in Special Relativity.Michel Janssen - 2009 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 40 (1):26-52.

View all 69 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-04-09

Total views
354 ( #19,665 of 2,344,158 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
7 ( #99,266 of 2,344,158 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes