Natural kind terms and recognitional capacities

Mind 107 (426):275-303 (1998)
Abstract
The main contribution of this paper is a new account of how a community may introduce a term for a natural kind in advance of knowing the correct scientific account of that kind. The account is motivated by the inadequacy of the currently dominant accounts of how a community may do this, namely those proposed by Kripke and by Putman. Their accounts fail to deal satisfactorily with the facts that (1) typically, an item that instantiates one natural kind instantiates several - 'the higher-level natural kinds problem', and (2) natural kinds often occur in nature in impure form - 'the composition problem' .On the account I propose, a term for a natural kind gains its reference by being associated with a recognitional capacity for that kind. I show how members of a scientifically ignorant community could have a recognitional capacity for a natural kind, say gold, as opposed to a certain kind of appearance, for instance the appearance that gold actually has. I argue that members of such a community can have recognitional capacities for particular natural kinds despite the actual or possible existence of duplicate kinds, e.g. water. After developing the account in detail, I show how it can deal with the two problems faced by Kripke's and Putnam's problem. The case of natural kind terms is crucial to the central debate in the philosophy of language and the philosophy of mind about whether we can refer non-descriptively to objects and kinds in the world. I take the account I propose to be a non-descriptive account of linguistic reference to natural kinds that can be used to support externalism in the philosophy of mind
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/mind/107.426.275
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,173
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
The Limits of Conceptual Analysis.Laura Schroeter - 2004 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 85 (4):425-453.
Proto-Rigidity.Jussi Haukioja - 2006 - Synthese 150 (2):155-169.

View all 17 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Natural Phenomenon Terms.Richard Gray - 2006 - Analysis 66 (290):141–148.
Natural Kinds and Natural Kind Terms.Kathrin Koslicki - 2008 - Philosophy Compass 3 (4):789-802.
Naming Natural Kinds.Asa Maria Wikforss - 2005 - Synthese 145 (1):65-87.
Rigidity, Natural Kind Terms, and Metasemantics.Corine Besson - 2010 - In Helen Beebee & Nigel Sabbarton-Leary (eds.), The Semantics and Metaphysics of Natural Kinds. Routledge. pp. 25--44.
Is Disease a Natural Kind?Robert D.'Amico - 1995 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 20 (5):551-569.
La durata naturale di un genere naturale.Andrea Borghini - 2008 - Rivista di Estetica 48 (39):89-101.

Monthly downloads

Added to index

2009-01-28

Total downloads

121 ( #38,778 of 2,152,503 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

8 ( #90,244 of 2,152,503 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature


Discussion
Order:
There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums