In Dave Monroe & Fritz Allhoff (eds.), Food & Philosophy: Eat, Think, and Be Merry. Blackwell (2007)
AbstractCommon wisdom includes expressions such as “there is no accounting for taste'’ that express a widely-accepted subjectivism about taste. We commonly say things like “I can’t stand anything with onions in it'’ or “Oh, I’d never eat sushi,'’ and we accept such from our friends and associates. It is the position of this essay that much of this language is actually quite unacceptable. Without appealing to complete objectivism about taste, I will argue that there are good reasons to think that there will be fairly wide agreement between experienced palates on aesthetic preferences, and that this result will not necessarily agree with unexperienced and unreflective opinions on the matter. Subjectivism about aesthetic preference can be taken to justify the practice of picking eating (after all, who is better to say what I’ll enjoy than me?), while the position of this paper is that such picky eating is a moral failing. To be a picky eater is to have a significant lack of openness to new experiences. It involves an irresponsible level of fallibilism with respect to taste. Never venturing into new aesthetic landscapes leads to a sort of repetitiveness, which in turn leads to a life full of blandness and banality.
Similar books and articles
Persecutors or Victims? The Moral Logic at the Heart of Eating Disorders.Simona Giordano - 2003 - Health Care Analysis 11 (3):219-228.
Veganism and Living Well.Christopher Ciocchetti - 2012 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 25 (3):405-417.
On the Old Saw “I know nothing about art but I know what I like".Kevin Melchionne - 2010 - Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 68 (2):131-141.
No safe harbor: The principle of complicity and the practice of voluntary stopping of eating and drinking.Lynn A. Jansen - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (1):61 – 74.
Taste and objectivity: The emergence of the concept of the aesthetic.Elisabeth Schellekens - 2009 - Philosophy Compass 4 (5):734-743.
Vegetarianism, Traditional Morality, and Moral Conservatism.David Detmer - 2007 - Journal of Philosophical Research 32 (9999):39-48.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
References found in this work
No references found.