NanoEthics 2 (1):73-86 (2008)
AbstractThis paper, guided by the UNESCO Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights, assumes that regulators should aim to support the development of nanomedicine while, at the same time, putting in place whatever limits or safeguards are indicated by ethical considerations. Relative to this regulatory objective, it is argued that, notwithstanding the importance of precaution (characteristically, concerning health, safety, and the environment), ethical reflection needs to go both broader and deeper. It is suggested that, by attending to the basic matrix of ethical debate and the “bioethical triangle” through which the matrix is currently articulated, the breadth, depth, and conflictual plurality of ethical concerns about nanomedicine will be clarified. In this light, the conventional thinking about precaution is revisited and concerns about human dignity and informed consent (under conditions of extreme uncertainty) are analysed. The paper concludes that, once the range of ethical pluralism is grasped, the extent of the challenge facing regulators will be more clearly appreciated.
Similar books and articles
Nanomedicine: Ethical Concerns Beyond Diagnostics, Drugs, and Techniques.Ellen M. McGee - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (10):14-15.
Freitas on Disease in Nanomedicine: Implications for Ethics. [REVIEW]Vassiliki L. Leontis & George J. Agich - 2010 - NanoEthics 4 (3):205-214.
Microbicide Research in Developing Countries: Have We Given the Ethical Concerns Due Consideration?Keymanthri Moodley - 2007 - BMC Medical Ethics 8 (1):1-7.
The Unique Ethical Challenges of Conducting Research in the Rehabilitation Medicine Population.Jeff Blackmer - 2003 - BMC Medical Ethics 4 (1):1-6.
A Prudential Argument for Precaution Under Uncertainty and High Risk.Stephen Haller - 2000 - Ethics and the Environment 5 (2):175-189.
Regulating Ethical Issues in Cell-Based Interventions: Lessons From Universal Declaration on Bioethics and Human Rights.Ana Rosa Tenório de Amorim - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (5):49-50.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
The Social and Ethical Acceptability of NBICs for Purposes of Human Enhancement: Why Does the Debate Remain Mired in Impasse? [REVIEW]Jean-Pierre Béland, Johane Patenaude, Georges A. Legault, Patrick Boissy & Monelle Parent - 2011 - NanoEthics 5 (3):295-307.
Nanotechnology and Ethics: The Role of Regulation Versus Self-Commitment in Shaping Researchers' Behavior. [REVIEW]Matthias Fink, Rainer Harms & Isabella Hatak - 2012 - Journal of Business Ethics 109 (4):569-581.
References found in this work
Life, Liberty, and the Defense of Dignity: The Challenge for Bioethics.Leon Kass - 2002 - Encounter Books.