Philosophical Topics 37 (2):141-160 (2009)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
In this article I examine how reforming our international tax regime could be an important vehicle for realizing key aspects of global gender justice. Ensuring all,including and especially multinationals, pay their fair share of taxes is crucial to ensuring that all countries, especially developing countries, are able to fund education, job training, infrastructural development, programs which promote gender equity, and so forth, thereby enabling all countries to help themselves better. I discuss various positive proposals for levying global taxes. I review why overtly gender-neutral taxes can sometimes have unintended gendered consequences, disproportionately burdening or benefiting individuals, according to their gender. Any endorsement of global taxes must take this concern into account. Fortunately there is good fit between the rationale for the Tobin tax and the way in which it can be harnessed to promote gender equity, so of the taxes discussed here, it emerges as one of the most promising. However, as I also argue, eliminating tax havens and blocking avenues that currently facilitate tax escape must also be part of the agenda to promote gender equity, given the vast amounts of revenue that currently escape taxation. In a context of globalization, fiscal policies cannot achieve equity (including gender equity) at national levels alone. Many concerns, such as clamping down on tax evasion and harmonizing corporate tax rates, can only effectively be tackled at a global level. As I also discuss, feasible arrangements for tackling such issues are available, as are mechanisms for collecting and disbursing funds in ways that promote accountability and compliance. Failing to reform our tax arrangements means that the basic institutional structure of the global economy is unjust and also involves gender injustice. Gender consciousness is indispensable for developing an adequate account of taxation justice and therefore a global institutional structure that is gender just
|
Keywords | Analytic Philosophy General Interest Philosophy of Mind |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | 0276-2080 |
DOI | 10.5840/philtopics20093729 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Taxation and Global Justice: Closing the Gap Between Theory and Practice.Gillian Brock - 2008 - Journal of Social Philosophy 39 (2):161–184.
Gender, Exposure to Tax Knowledge, and Attitudes Towards Taxation; an Experimental Approach.Lars Fallan - 1999 - Journal of Business Ethics 18 (2):173 - 184.
Is Rooted Cosmopolitanism Bad for Women?Kathryn Walker - 2012 - Journal of Global Ethics 8 (1):77-90.
Care, Gender and Global Social Justice: Rethinking 'Ethical Globalization'.Fiona Robinson - 2006 - Journal of Global Ethics 2 (1):5 – 25.
The Uneasy Case for Capital Taxation.Edward J. McCaffery - 2006 - Social Philosophy and Policy 23 (2):166-184.
Basic Income, Gender Justice and the Costs of Gender-Symmetrical Lifestyles.Anca Gheaus - 2008 - Basic Income Studies 3 (3).
The Effect of Friendly Persuasion and Gender on Tax Compliance Behavior.Janne Chung & Viswanath Umashanker Trivedi - 2003 - Journal of Business Ethics 47 (2):133 - 145.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2011-01-09
Total views
31 ( #333,218 of 2,410,251 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #188,523 of 2,410,251 )
2011-01-09
Total views
31 ( #333,218 of 2,410,251 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #188,523 of 2,410,251 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads