Philosophical Studies 163 (1):67-76 (2013)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
Philosophy of Science After Feminism is an important contribution to philosophy of science, in that it argues for the central relevance of advances from previous work in feminist philosophy of science and articulates a new vision for philosophy of science going in to the future. Kourany’s vision of philosophy of science’s future as “socially engaged and socially responsible” and addressing questions of the social responsibility of science itself has much to recommend it. I focus the book articulation of an ethical-epistemic ideal for science, the Ideal of Socially Responsible Science, compare it to recent work in the same vein by Heather Douglas, and argue for some advantages of Kourany’s approach. I then ask some critical question about the view, particularly with respect to the source of values that are to be integrated into science and the status of values that are to be so integrated. I argue that Kourany is too sanguine about where the values that inquirers will use come from and that these values seem to be accorded too fixed a status in her account
|
Keywords | Janet Kourany Heather Douglas Values in science Feminist philosophy of science Democracy Pluralism |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1007/s11098-012-0070-x |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
The Scientist Qua Scientist Makes Value Judgments.Richard Rudner - 1953 - Philosophy of Science 20 (1):1-6.
View all 14 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
Values in Science Beyond Underdetermination and Inductive Risk.Matthew J. Brown - 2013 - Philosophy of Science 80 (5):829-839.
Whose Social Values? Evaluating Canada’s ‘Death of Evidence’ Controversy.Maya J. Goldenberg - 2015 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 45 (3):404-424.
Values and Data Collection in Social Research.Julie Zahle - 2018 - Philosophy of Science 85 (1):144-163.
View all 14 citations / Add more citations
Similar books and articles
Meeting the Challenges to Socially Responsible Science: Reply to Brown, Lacey, and Potter.Janet A. Kourany - 2013 - Philosophical Studies 163 (1):93-103.
A Philosophy of Science for the Twenty‐First Century.Janet A. Kourany - 2003 - Philosophy of Science 70 (1):1-14.
The Ideal of Socially Responsible Science: Reply to Dupré, Rolin, Solomon, and Giere.Janet A. Kourany - 2012 - Perspectives on Science 20 (3):344-352.
Replacing the Ideal of Value-Free Science.Janet A. Kourany - 2008 - In Martin Carrier, Don Howard & Janet A. Kourany (eds.), The Challenge of the Social and the Pressure of Practice: Science and Values Revisited. University of Pittsburgh Press. pp. 87--111.
Biological Science and Feminist Values.Michael Ruse - 1984 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1984:525 - 542.
The Challenge of the Social and the Pressure of Practice: Science and Values Revisited.Martin Carrier, Don Howard & Janet A. Kourany (eds.) - 2008 - University of Pittsburgh Press.
Economic Values in the Configuration of Science.Wenceslao J. González - 2008 - Poznan Studies in the Philosophy of the Sciences and the Humanities 96 (1):85-112.
Getting Philosophy of Science Socially Connected.Janet A. Kourany - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (5):991-1002.
Methodological Norms in Traditional and Feminist Philosophy of Science.Elizabeth Potter - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:101 - 108.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2012-08-21
Total views
126 ( #91,289 of 2,497,758 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #212,462 of 2,497,758 )
2012-08-21
Total views
126 ( #91,289 of 2,497,758 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
3 ( #212,462 of 2,497,758 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads