American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):43 – 54 (2009)

Authors
Mark B. Brown
California State University, Sacramento
Abstract
Many commentators today lament the politicization of bioethics, but some suggest distinguishing among different kinds of politicization. This essay pursues that idea with reference to three traditions of political thought: liberalism, communitarianism, and republicanism. After briefly discussing the concept of politicization itself, the essay examines how each of these political traditions manifests itself in recent bioethics scholarship, focusing on the implications of each tradition for the design of government bioethics councils. The liberal emphasis on the irreducible plurality of values and interests in modern societies, and the communitarian concern with the social dimensions of biotechnology, offer important insights for bioethics councils. The essay finds the most promise in the republican tradition, however, which emphasizes institutional mechanisms that allow bioethics councils to enrich but not dominate public deliberation, while ensuring that government decisions on bioethical issues are publicly accountable and contestable.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/15265160802617811
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 69,959
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Law and Disagreement.Jeremy Waldron - 1998 - Oxford University Press.
Law and Disagreement.Jeremy Waldron - 1998 - Oxford University Press UK.

View all 81 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Evidence, Ethics and Inclusion: A Broader Base for NICE. [REVIEW]Stephen Wilmot - 2011 - Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 14 (2):111-121.
Republicanism in Bioethics?Chris Durante - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):55 – 56.
Bioethics and Politics: Rules of Engagement.Jenny Dyck Brian & Adam Briggle - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):59 – 61.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Reflections on Public Bioethics: A View From the Trenches.Leon Kass - 2005 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (3):221-250.
The Ethics of Bioethics: Mapping the Moral Landscape.Carolyn Ells - 2010 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 3 (2):170-175.
Why a Feminist Approach to Bioethics?Margaret Olivia Little - 1996 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 6 (1):1-18.
Feminist Bioethics: At the Center, on the Margins. [REVIEW]Robyn Bluhm - 2011 - International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 4 (2):154-159.
Global Bioethics: Utopia or Reality?Sirkku K. Hellsten - 2008 - Developing World Bioethics 8 (2):70-81.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-02-08

Total views
44 ( #256,880 of 2,504,822 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #417,030 of 2,504,822 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes