Wandering drunks and general lawlessness in biology: does diversity and complexity tend to increase in evolutionary systems?
Biology and Philosophy 26 (6):915-933 (2011)
Does biology have general laws that apply to all levels of biological organisation, across all evolutionary time? In their book “Biology’s first law: the tendency for diversity and complexity to increase in evolutionary systems” (2010), Daniel McShea and Robert Brandon propose that the most fundamental law of biology is that all levels of biological organisation have an underlying tendency to become more complex and diverse over time. A range of processes, most notably selection, can prevent the expression of this tendency, but they predict that, on average, we should see that lineages tend toward greater diversity and complexity, driven by fundamentally neutral processes. Their hypothesis can be summarised as “diversity is easy, stasis is hard”. Here, I consider evidence for this “zero force evolutionary law”. It provides a fair description of evolutionary change at the genomic level, but the predictions of the proposed law are not met for broad scale patterns in the evolution of the animal kingdom
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
On the Origin of Species: By Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life.Charles Darwin - 2008 - Sterling.
The Major Transitions in Evolution.John Maynard Smith & Eors Szathmary - 1996 - Journal of the History of Biology 29 (1):151-152.
Two Outbreaks of Lawlessness in Recent Philosophy of Biology.Elliott Sober - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):467.
Sober and Elgin on Laws of Biology: A Critique. [REVIEW]Lane DesAutels - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (2):249-256.
The Small Picture Approach to the Big Picture: Using DNA Sequences to Investigate the Diversification of Animal Body Plans.Lindell Bromham - 2011 - In Brett Calcott & Kim Sterelny (eds.), The Major Transitions in Evolution Revisited. MIT Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Puzzles for ZFEL, McShea and Brandon's Zero Force Evolutionary Law.Martin Barrett, Hayley Clatterbuck, Michael Goldsby, Casey Helgeson, Brian McLoone, Trevor Pearce, Elliott Sober, Reuben Stern & Naftali Weinberger - 2012 - Biology and Philosophy 27 (5):723-735.
A Law by Any Other Name Would Smell as Sweet. [REVIEW]Roberta L. Millstein - 2010 - Science 330:1048-1049.
Review of Daniel W. McShea and Robert N. Brandon, Biology's First Law. [REVIEW]Mohan Matthen - 2011 - Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews 2011 (1).
How Evolutionary Biology Presently Pervades Cell and Molecular Biology.Michel Morange - 2010 - Journal for General Philosophy of Science / Zeitschrift für Allgemeine Wissenschaftstheorie 41 (1):113 - 120.
Progress in Evolutionary Economics.James Maclaurin & Tim Cochrane - 2012 - Journal of Bioeconomics 14 (2):101-14.
Does Nothing in Evolution Make Sense Except in the Light of Population Genetics?Lindell Bromham - 2009 - Biology and Philosophy 24 (3):387-403.
Comments on Complexity and Experimentation in Biology.Richard M. Burian - 1997 - Philosophy of Science 64 (4):291.
Redundant Complexity: A Critical Analysis of Intelligent Design in Biochemistry.Niall Shanks & Karl H. Joplin - 1999 - Philosophy of Science 66 (2):268-282.
Biological Thinking in Evolutionary Psychology: Rockbottom or Quicksand?H. Looren De Jong & W. J. Van Der Steen - 1998 - Philosophical Psychology 11 (2):183 – 205.
Added to index2011-03-09
Total downloads28 ( #178,992 of 2,153,485 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #399,083 of 2,153,485 )
How can I increase my downloads?