Abstract
Future technological developmentsconcerning food, agriculture, and theenvironment face a gulf of social legitimationfrom a skeptical public and media, in the wakeof the crises of BSE, GM food, and foot andmouth disease in the UK (House of Lords, 2000). Keyethical issues were ignored by the bioindustry,regulators, and the Government, leaving alegacy of distrust. The paper examinesagricultural biotechnology in terms of a socialcontract, whose conditions would have to be fulfilled togain acceptance of novel applications. Variouscurrent and future GM applications areevaluated against these conditions. Successwould depend critically on how far a sharedvision can be found with the public. Tore-establish trust, significant changes areidentified in the planning and pursuit ofbiotechnology.
Keywords accountability  biotechnology  consultation  consumer perceptions  control  environmental risk  ethics  genetic modification  GM animals  GM food  GM crops  nutraceuticals  policy  power  risk  safety  shared vision  social contract  trust  values
Categories (categorize this paper)
Reprint years 2004
DOI 10.1023/A:1015738727342
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,391
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

The Case for Regulating Intragenic GMOs.A. Wendy Russell & Robert Sparrow - 2008 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 21 (2):153-181.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Biotechnology and Global Justice.Tony Smith - 1999 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 11 (3):219-242.
Biotechnology is Not Compatible with Sustainable Agriculture.Martha L. Crouch - 1995 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 8 (2):98-111.
Agricultural Biotechnology and the Future Benefits Argument.Jeffrey Burkhardt - 2001 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 14 (2):135-145.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total views
49 ( #189,132 of 2,326,281 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #644,397 of 2,326,281 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes