Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy 15 (3):321-328 (2012)
A recent study by Castellani et al. (JAMA 302(23):2573–2579, 2009) describes the population-level effects of the choices of individuals who underwent molecular carrier screening for cystic fibrosis (CF) in Veneto, in the northeastern part of Italy, between 1993 and 2007. We discuss some of the ethical issues raised by the policies and individual choices that are the subject of this study. In particular, (1) we discuss the ethical issues raised by the acquisition of genetic information through antenatal carrier testing; (2) we consider whether by choosing to procreate naturally these couples can harm the resulting child and/or other members of society, and what the moral implications of such harm would be; (3) we consider whether by choosing to avoid natural procreation carrier couples can harm current or future individuals affected by cystic fibrosis; (4) we discuss whether programs that make carrier testing available can be considered eugenic programs.
|Keywords||Carrier screening Cystic fibrosis Eugenics Genetic testing Reproductive freedom|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
From Chance to Choice: Genetics and Justice.Allen Buchanan, Dan W. Brock, Norman Daniels & Daniel Wikler - 2000 - Philosophy 76 (297):472-475.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Is Cystic Fibrosis Genetic Medicine's Canary?Susan Lindee & Rebecca Mueller - 2011 - Perspectives in Biology and Medicine 54 (3):316-331.
Genetic Screening and Ethics: European Perspectives.Ruth Chadwick, Henk ten Have, Jfrgen Husted, Mairi Levitt, Tony McGleenan, Darren Shickle & Urban Wiesing - 1998 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 23 (3):255 – 273.
Gene Therapy for Children with Cystic Fibrosis--Who has the Right to Choose?A. Jaffe - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (6):361-364.
Heterogeneity of Risk Within Racial Groups, a Challenge for Public Health Programs.Sean A. Valles - 2012 - Preventive Medicine 55 (5):405-408.
Antenatal Screening and its Possible Meaning From Unborn Baby's Perspective.Sahin Aksoy - 2001 - BMC Medical Ethics 2 (1):1-11.
Wrongful Life: Paradoxes in the Morality of Causing People to Exist.Jeff McMahan - 1998 - In Jules L. Coleman, Christopher W. Morris & Gregory S. Kavka (eds.), Rational Commitment and Social Justice: Essays for Gregory Kavka. Cambridge University Press. pp. 208--47.
Ethical Issues in Cancer Screening and Prevention.Anya Plutynski - 2012 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 37 (3):310-323.
The Mystery of the Mystery of Common Genetic Diseases.Sean A. Valles - 2010 - Biology and Philosophy 25 (2):183-201.
The Ethics of Krabbe Newborn Screening.R. H. Dees & J. M. Kwon - 2013 - Public Health Ethics 6 (1):114-128.
Ethical Issues Related to Screening for Preeclampsia.Jennifer M. Jørgensen, Paula L. Hedley, Mickey Gjerris & Michael Christiansen - 2014 - Bioethics 28 (7):360-367.
Private and Public Eugenics: Genetic Testing and Screening in India. [REVIEW]Jyotsna Agnihotri Gupta - 2007 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 4 (3):217-228.
The Ethics of Screening in Health Care and Medicine: Serving Society Or Serving the Patient?Niklas Juth & Christian Munthe - 2012 - Springer Verlag.
Working Up Policy : The Use of Specific Disease Exemplars in Formulating General Principles Governing Childhood Genetic Testing. [REVIEW]Paula Boddington & Susan Hogben - unknown
Predictive Genetic Testing for Conditions That Present in Childhood.Lainie Friedman Ross - 2002 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 12 (3):225-244.
Added to index2011-10-18
Total downloads90 ( #58,338 of 2,178,176 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #166,021 of 2,178,176 )
How can I increase my downloads?