Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (2):147-166 (2009)
This essay proposes a theory of excuse that, without blending it into exculpation, avoids the condonation of crime. The question it takes up is: given that neither compulsion by circumstances nor by human threats removes the legal reason for punishing, how can its exonerating force be rendered compatible with the stateâs general duty to punish the guilty? The chapter criticizes various proposals for reconciling excuse with the duty to punish the guilty, including the moral involuntariness theory, the concession to frailty theory, and the conformity to moral expectation theory. It then proposes a solution: moral blamelessness exonerates because it simulates the conditions for legal exculpation. Just as the exculpated actor acknowledges the legal norm of mutual respect for agents, so does the excused actor acknowledge the public reason of the self-sufficient political community of which the legal norm is a part. The author argues that this theory would excuse the altruistic no less than the self-preferring murderer
|Keywords||Excusing necessity Criminal law Terrorism|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Offences and Defences: Selected Essays in the Philosophy of Criminal Law.John Gardner - 2007 - Oxford University Press.
Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy.Philippa Foot - 1978 - Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Censure Theory and Intuitions About Punishment.Thaddeus Metz - 2000 - Law and Philosophy 19 (4):491-512.
On Necessity as a Defence to Crime: Possibilities, Problems and the Limits of Justification and Excuse.Ian Howard Dennis - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 3 (1):29-49.
Readings in the Philosophy of Law.John Arthur & William H. Shaw (eds.) - 2010 - Pearson Prentice Hall.
The Place of Legal Positivism in Contemporary Constitutional States.G. Pino - 1999 - Law and Philosophy 18 (5):513-536.
Legislative Duty and the Independence of Law.J. H. Bogart - 1987 - Law and Philosophy 6 (2):187 - 203.
Torture, Necessity and Supreme Emergency: Law and Morality at the End of Law.Zachary R. Calo - unknown
Justifying the Distinction Between Justifications and Power (Justifications Vs. Power).Miriam Gur-Arye - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (3):293-313.
Crime, Freedom and Civic Bonds: Arthur Ripstein's Force and Freedom: Kant's Legal and Political Philosophy. [REVIEW]Ekow N. Yankah - 2012 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 6 (2):255-272.
Legal Republicanism: National and International Perspectives.Samantha Besson & Jos Luis Mart (eds.) - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
The Constitution of Criminal Law: Justifications, Policing and the State's Fiduciary Duties. [REVIEW]Malcolm Thorburn - 2011 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 5 (3):259-276.
Added to index2010-09-13
Total downloads15 ( #308,638 of 2,152,538 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #281,162 of 2,152,538 )
How can I increase my downloads?