Erkenntnis 69 (1):1 - 30 (2008)
There is a long-standing debate whether propositions, sentences, statements or utterances provide an answer to the question of what objects logical formulas stand for. Based on the traditional understanding of logic as a science of valid arguments, this question is firstly framed more exactly, making explicit that it calls not only for identifying some class of objects, but also for explaining their relationship to ordinary language utterances. It is then argued that there are strong arguments against the proposals commonly put forward in the debate. The core of the problem is that an informative account of the objects formulas stand for presupposes a theory of formalization; that is, a theory that explains what formulas may adequately substitute for an inference in proofs of validity. Although such theories are still subject to research, some consequences can be drawn from an analysis of the reasons why the common accounts featuring sentences, propositions or utterances fail. Theories of formalization cannot refer to utterances qua expressions of propositions; instead they may refer to sentences and rely on additional information about linguistic structure and pragmatic context.
|Keywords||Philosophy of logic Formalization Proposition Natural Language Logical Form|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Themes From Kaplan.Joseph Almog, John Perry & Howard K. Wettstein (eds.) - 1989 - Oxford University Press, Usa.
Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment.Robert B. Brandom - 1994 - Harvard University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Exhibiting Interpretational and Representational Validity.Michael Baumgartner - 2013 - Synthese (7):1-25.
Interpreting Enthymematic Arguments Using Belief Revision.Georg Brun & Hans Rott - 2013 - Synthese 190 (18):4041-4063.
Similar books and articles
What Are Physical Objects?Ned Markosian - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 61 (2):375-395.
Domains of Sciences, Universes of Discourse and Omega Arguments.Jose M. Saguillo - 1999 - History and Philosophy of Logic 20 (3-4):267-290.
Logical Form and Reflective Equilibrium.Vladimír Svoboda & Jaroslav Peregrin - forthcoming - Synthese.
The Paradox of the First Person Singular Pronoun.Avrum Stroll - 1963 - Inquiry : An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 6 (1-4):217 – 233.
Notions of Sameness by Default and Their Application to Anaphora, Vagueness, and Uncertain Reasoning.Ariel Cohen, Michael Kaminski & Johann A. Makowsky - 2008 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 17 (3):285-306.
Formalizing Context (Expanded Notes).John McCarthy & Sasa Buvac - 1998 - CSLI Lecture Notes 81:13-50.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads71 ( #73,936 of 2,170,276 )
Recent downloads (6 months)3 ( #126,628 of 2,170,276 )
How can I increase my downloads?